2014
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnu059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rank of Divisors on Hyperelliptic Curves and Graphs Under Specialization

Abstract: Let (G, ω) be a hyperelliptic vertex-weighted graph of genus g ≥ 2. We give a characterization of (G, ω) for which there exists a smooth projective curve X of genus g over a complete discrete valuation field with reduction graph (G, ω) such that the ranks of any divisors are preserved under specialization. We explain, for a given vertex-weighted graph (G, ω) in general, how the existence of such X relates the Riemann-Roch formulae for X and (G, ω), and also how the existence of such X is related to a conjectur… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will address the problem whether the divisors constructed in some of the combinatorial results of Section are liftable. Other lifting problems addressed in the literature question themselves if given a metric graph there exists a curve such that any divisor on the graph is liftable, see for example . Question Let Γ be a metric graph.…”
Section: Specialization Map Triangulated Punctured Curves and Skeletamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will address the problem whether the divisors constructed in some of the combinatorial results of Section are liftable. Other lifting problems addressed in the literature question themselves if given a metric graph there exists a curve such that any divisor on the graph is liftable, see for example . Question Let Γ be a metric graph.…”
Section: Specialization Map Triangulated Punctured Curves and Skeletamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [KY1] and [KY2, Thm 1.1 and Thm 1.2] the authors prove the inequality r alg (G, δ) ≥ r G (δ) in certain cases; combining with Theorem 4.2, we have the following partial answer to Problem 1.…”
Section: Now We Definementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Our basic references are Amini, Baker, Brugallé, and Rabinoff [2], Baker and Norine [6], Amini and Caporaso [3], and Baker and Rabinoff [9]. See also [35,36].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Cools, Draisma, Payne and Robeva [19] gave a tropical proof of the Brill-Noether theorem. See also [17,18,35,36], for example. Remark 1.9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%