2008
DOI: 10.1051/forest:2008040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rank reversals in tree growth along tree size, competition and climatic gradients for four forest canopy dominant species in Central Spain

Abstract: -• Interspecific differences in tree growth patterns with respect to biotic and abiotic factors are key for understanding forest structure and dynamics, and predicting potential changes under climate change.• Repeated observations from the Spanish Forest Inventory (SFI) were used to parameterize maximum likelihood estimators of tree growth as a function of tree size, competition indices and climate for Pinus pinaster, P. sylvestris, Quercus ilex and Q. pyrenaica.• Significant responses to both biotic and abiot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At local scales, competition is an important driver of secondary succession, with species upper limits along a productivity gradient being controlled by shade tolerance (Pacala et al, 1996;Tilman, 1994). That the effect of basal area is less negative for broad-leaved species than for needle-leaved species might represent a greater role of facilitation for broad-leaves species, which are typically more shade tolerant (Sánchez- Gómez et al, 2008b). However, the magnitude of the potential facilitative effects within the broad-leaved species was less important than the potential competitive effects experienced by the needle-leaved species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At local scales, competition is an important driver of secondary succession, with species upper limits along a productivity gradient being controlled by shade tolerance (Pacala et al, 1996;Tilman, 1994). That the effect of basal area is less negative for broad-leaved species than for needle-leaved species might represent a greater role of facilitation for broad-leaves species, which are typically more shade tolerant (Sánchez- Gómez et al, 2008b). However, the magnitude of the potential facilitative effects within the broad-leaved species was less important than the potential competitive effects experienced by the needle-leaved species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A livestock decrease, however, could also have led to higher plant species diversity. Most differences observed in above-ground productivity among forest stands differing in tree species richness could be attributed to species-specific traits or contrasting site conditions rather than to the number of tree species present (Kerr et al, 1992;Pretzsch, 2005;Sánchez-Gómez et al 2008;Vilà et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These diverse results reflect that the tree growth response to climate is context-dependent, i.e., it depends on the neighbourhood settings, but it is also idiosyncratic for each tree species [19,29]. Forest ecosystems seem to be especially sensitive to climate change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree growth depends on resource availability (i.e., light, water, nutrients), which is related to both abiotic factors, like soil type or climate [19], and biotic factors, like tree competition [7,20,21]. Climate and competition are the two major drivers that limit tree growth, but competition from neighbours may cause a greater reduction in growth than climate, at least in temperate forests [9,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%