Ranking conceptual locations for a park-and-ride parking lot using EDAS method

Barauskas, Andrius; Jakovlevas-Mateckis, Konstantinas; Palevičius, Vytautas; Antuchevičienė, Jurgita

doi:10.14256/jce.1961.2016

Cited by 16 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Podvezko V. and Sivilevičius H. [42] employed the AHP method and examined transport systems through the prism of traffic safety. Other researchers applied MCDM methods in specifying locations to implement mobility measures [43].…”

Section: The Results Of Applying Multicriteria Decision Making Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Sustainable Mobility Measures Applying Multicriteria Decision Making Methods

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An increasing number of recent discussions have focused on the need for designing transport systems in consonance with the importance of the environment, thus promoting investment in the growth of non-motorized transport infrastructure. Under such conditions, the demand for implementing the most effective infrastructure measures has a profoundly positive impact, and requires the least possible financial and human resources. The development of the concept of sustainable mobility puts emphasis on the integrated planning of transport systems, and pays major attention to the expansion of non-motorized and public transport, and different sharing systems, as well as to effective traffic management involving intelligent transport systems. The development of transport infrastructure requires massive investment, and hence the proper use of mobility measures is one of the most important objectives for the rational planning of sustainable transport systems. To achieve this established goal, this article examines a compiled set of mobility measures and identifies the significance of the preferred tools, which involve sustainable mobility experts. The paper also applies multicriteria decision making methods in assessing urban transport systems and their potential in terms of sustainable mobility. Multicriteria decision making methods have been successfully used for assessing the effectiveness of sustainable transport systems, and for comparing them between cities. The proposed universal evaluation model is applied to similar types of cities. The article explores the adaptability of the model by assessing big Lithuanian cities.

show abstract

Section: The Results Of Applying Multicriteria Decision Making Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Sustainable Mobility Measures Applying Multicriteria Decision Making Methods

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The P&R system and MCDM techniques are combined in a few studies. For example, social, environmental, and economic criteria were applied to assess the location of P&R in combination with the VISUM software [57,58].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Integrated Multi Criteria Decision Making Model for Evaluating Park-and-Ride Facility Location Issue: A Case Study for Cuenca City in Ecuador

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A park-and-ride (P&R) system is a set of facilities where private vehicle users can transfer to public transport to continue their journey. The main advantage of the system is decreasing the congestion in the central business district. This paper aims to analyze the most significant factors related to a Park-and-Ride facility location by adopting a combined model of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Best Worst Method (BWM). The integrated model is applicable for complex problems, which can be structured as a hierarchy with at least one 5 × 5 pairwise comparison matrix (PCM) (or bigger). Applying AHP for at least 5 × 5 PCM may generate inconsistent matrices, which may cause a loss of reliable information. As a solution for this gap, we conducted BWM, which generates more consistent comparisons compared to the AHP approach. Moreover, the model requires fewer comparisons compared to the classic AHP approach. That is the main reason of adopting the AHP-BWM model to evaluate Park-and-Ride facility location factors for a designed two-level hierarchical structure. As a case study, a real-world complex decision-making process was selected to evaluate the Park-and-Ride facility location problem in Cuenca city, Ecuador. The result shows that the application of multi-criteria methods becomes a planning tool for experts when designing a P&R system.

show abstract

“…In the same research line, an interesting investigation was developed that includes aspects, such as economic, social, urban, and environmental, to determine the location of the facilities. The authors used evaluation based on the distance from average solution (EDAS) in order to determine the decision regarding the location of a park-and-ride (P&R) facility [55].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Integrated Approach of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Triangular Fuzzy Sets for Analyzing the Park-and-Ride Facility Location Problem

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A park and ride (P&R) system is a set of facilities where private vehicle users can transfer to public transport to complete their journey. The main advantage of the system is reducing the congestions problem in the central business district (CBD). Thus, the notion of symmetry is particularly important in multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA) because they are basic characteristics of the binary relationships used in modelling the preferences of decision-makers. The focal point of this study is evaluating the P&R facility system location problem from the experts’ point of view. For this aim, an integrated multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology is proposed to evaluate the location of the facilities of the P&R system. The questionnaire survey was designed and estimated by 10 transport experts in the related field. The famous analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was adopted in a fuzzy environment, where the fuzzy sets have an efficient ability to manage the vague concepts in a specific way; moreover, it can mitigate the evaluator reasoning during decision-making. The hierarchical structure of the problem was established to evaluate a real-life problem in Cuenca city, Ecuador. The outcomes highlighted the “accessibility of public transport” as the most significant issue in the P&R facility location problem. The obtained results provide more flexible facilities than the pure AHP method.

show abstract

Ranking conceptual locations for a park-and-ride parking lot using EDAS method

Cited by 16 publications

References 19 publications

Assessing Sustainable Mobility Measures Applying Multicriteria Decision Making Methods

Assessing Sustainable Mobility Measures Applying Multicriteria Decision Making Methods

An Integrated Multi Criteria Decision Making Model for Evaluating Park-and-Ride Facility Location Issue: A Case Study for Cuenca City in Ecuador

An Integrated Approach of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Triangular Fuzzy Sets for Analyzing the Park-and-Ride Facility Location Problem

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About