Ranking de revistas científicas en Latinoamérica mediante el índice &lt;i&gt;h&lt;/i&gt;: estudio de caso Colombia

Romero-Torres, Mauricio; Acosta-Moreno, Luis Alberto; Tejada-Gómez, María Alejandra

doi:10.3989/redc.2013.1.876

Cited by 30 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Future studies can consider a more complex approach with several quality measures, including hard data indicators such as total citations or the H-index (Romero-Torres et al, 2013) in combination with perceptions, as well as a wider range of independent variables driving those perceptions (Theoharakis et al, 2007). Thus, such future studies can provide a deeper assessment and understanding of the quality of business journals in Latin America.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These rankings generally use two major methodological approaches, one based on expert judgments and one based on objective/quantitative indicators such as citations, cross citation patterns, references used, quality of authors (based on citations), or similar computations (Baumgartner & Pieters, 2003;Collazo-Reyes, Luna-Morales, Russell, & Pérez-Angón, 2008;Harzing & Val, 2009;Mingers & Harzing, 2007;Romero-Torres, Acosta-Moreno, & Tejada-Gómez, 2013). Previous studies have indicated that both types of journal assessment show high correlations (Mingers & Harzing, 2007).…”

Section: Business Journal Rankingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Using Expert Judgments to Rank 45 Latin American Business Journals

Olavarrieta

2016

Rev. adm. empres.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents the results of a study on the perception of quality of Latin American business journals based on the judgment of relevant experts -senior professors with knowledge of Latin American research and journals. Forty-five journals were included in the study. The highest perceived quality scores were given to Academia (CLADEA -Uniandes), RAE (Fundação Getulio Vargas), and Innovar (Universidad Nacional de Colombia). When perceived quality was weighted by awareness, Academia, LABR-Latin American Business Review (University of San Diego -Coppead), and Innovar had the highest scores. Results complement a recent study by Ruiz-Torres, Penkova, and Villafane (2012) that focused on management journals published in Spanish. Analysis of results suggests that language and branding have an effect on the perception of journal quality. Implications for editors/ publishers, tenure, promotion, research grant committees, and authors are provided.KEYWORDS | Scientifics journals, ranking, Latin America, scientific production, business research. RESUMO RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas | FGV/EAESP

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Business Journal Rankingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Expert Judgments to Rank 45 Latin American Business Journals

Olavarrieta

2016

Rev. adm. empres.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They additionally cite the increase of economic incentive for collaborative work (García-Martínez, Guerrero-Bote, & Moya-Anegón, 2012;Kliegl & Bates, 2010;Romero-Torres, Acosta-Moreno, & TejadaGómez, 2013). It is thus clear that increasing opportunities for collaboration may increase incentives for collaboration, and thus increase scientific output (Easterbrook, 1993;Johnson, 2009;Porac et al, 2004).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological Research Collaboration and Visibility in Iberoamerica

López‐López¹,

Anegón²,

Acevedo-Triana³

et al. 2015

Psicol. Reflex. Crit.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The phenomenon of collaboration is an increasing trend in many fields of science, including that of psychology. In Iberoamerican psychology, collaboration occurs on a local and international level. The aim of the study was to evaluate the levels of collaboration in Iberoamerica, using as a baseline the level of worldwide collaboration in psychology in 2012. We collected data from the Scopus database and analyzed it by cluster distribution. Analysis of the sample found within-country collaboration prominent among Iberoamerican psychologists. Findings indicated that in Iberoamerica there is significantly less global collaboration than in other regions, although Iberoamerican scientists are receptive to the idea and acknowledge its potential. Keywords: Scientific production, psychology, collaboration, Iberoamerica Resumo O fenômeno da colaboração é uma tendência em crescimento em muitos campos da ciência, incluindo a psicologia. Na psicologia ibero-americana a colaboração vem ocorrendo em nível regional e internacional. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar níveis de colaboração em Ibero-América, usando como linha de base o nível de colaboração mundial em psicologia nos anos de 2012. Os dados foram coletados da base Scopus e analisado pela distribuição de dados segundo seu grau de agrupamento (cluster). A análise mostrou que a colaboração entre ibero-americanos é maior dentro dos respectivos países e menor em nível global. Mesmo assim, destaque-se que cientistas ibero-americanos são receptivos a ideia de internacionalização e reconheçam seu potencial.

show abstract

“…Así mismo, se ha investigado el impacto y la productividad latinoamericana sobre educación matemática (Torres-Alfonso, Peralta-González y Toscano-Menocal, 2014), entre otras cuestiones. Algunos estudios han determinado el índice h para determinadas revistas colombianas (Romero-Torres, Acosta-Moreno y Tejada- Gómez, 2013) o abogan por que dicho índice no es aplicable a las revistas latinoamericanas debido al sesgo de idioma en muchas de las bases de datos internacionales (Monge-Nágera, 2014 En ocasiones, el objeto de estudio es una sola revista latinoamericana (Krauskopf, 2012;Maz-Machado, Jiménez-Fanjul, Adamuz-Povedano y Bracho-López, 2015) o todas las de un país. Por ejemplo, se han estudiado las revistas de medicina publicadas en Argentina en los años 2007-2008 y su visibilidad internacional (Colombo, 2009) y Gálvez (2006 analizó y comparó las revistas biomédicas chilenas con respecto a todas las de Latinoamérica.…”

unclassified

Revistas brasileñas de Educación en SCOPUS: un análisis bibliométrico

Martín

Jiménez–Fanjul²,

León–Mantero³

et al. 2017

Biblios

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenObjetivo. El auge de la producción científica en los últimos años ha motivado la realización de diversos estudios bibliométricos. En esta línea, este trabajo analiza las revistas brasileñas presentes en el índice de impacto de la base de datos SCOPUS, el SCImago Journal Rank, en la categoría de Educación entre los años 2000 y 2015.Método. Para llevar a cabo este estudio, se descargaron de la base de datos SCOPUS los datos relativos a los documentos publicados en estas revistas en dicho período y, a partir del recuento de frecuencias, se han identificado los patrones de producción de documentos por revista y por año, las instituciones más productivas, los países más productivos y se ha determinado el grado de colaboración en la autoría, así como, el patrón de citación recibida. Resultados. Los resultados muestran un aumento significativo de la producción de estas revistas, aunque de carácter muy local en esta comunidad científica y con un pequeño número de citas por documento. Palabras ClaveBibliometría; Brasil; Educación; Producción científica; Revistas; SCOPUS Brazilian Educational journals in SCOPUS: a bibliometric analysis AbstractObjective. The increase of scientific production during the last few years has aimed to carry out different bibliometric studies. In this line, this study analyses the Brazilian journals included in the impact index of the SCOPUS database, SCImago Journal Rank, in the category Education from 2000 to 2015. Method. In order to do this study, all the data related to the documents published in these journals during this period were downloaded from the SCOPUS database and frequency counts were made, they allowed to identify the patterns of production of documents by journal and by year, the most productive institutions and countries and to determine the degree of collaboration in authorship and the pattern of citation received. Results. The results show a significant increase in the production of these journals, but with a very local source in this scientific community and with a small number of citations per document. KeywordsBibliometrics; Brazil; Education; Journals; Scientific production; SCOPUS IntroducciónEl continuo aumento de la producción científica hace que los estudios bibliométricos cobren cada día más importancia. Estos estudios facilitan conocer cómo es la naturaleza de esta producción mediante la identificación de patrones de publicación, de colaboración o de impacto en términos de citación. La bibliometría permite obtener resultados cuantitativos y comparables sobre la comunicación escrita, por su estrecha relación con las matemáticas y la estadística (Montilla, 2012;Spinak, 1998). Esto permite que sea utilizada a la hora de diseñar tanto líneas de investigación como actuaciones en las políticas científicas de países, regiones o centros de investigación (Maz-Machado, Jiménez-Fanjul y Villarraga, 2016).

show abstract

Ranking de revistas científicas en Latinoamérica mediante el índice <i>h</i>: estudio de caso Colombia

Cited by 30 publications

References 58 publications

Using Expert Judgments to Rank 45 Latin American Business Journals

Using Expert Judgments to Rank 45 Latin American Business Journals

Psychological Research Collaboration and Visibility in Iberoamerica

Revistas brasileñas de Educación en SCOPUS: un análisis bibliométrico

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About