2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11102863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking of Risks for Existing and New Building Works

Abstract: Site safety is one critical factor affecting the sustainability of skyscrapers and decoration, repair, and maintenance projects. Many newly-built skyscrapers exceed 50 storeys in Hong Kong and decoration, repair, and maintenance projects are widely performed to extend the lifespans of buildings. Although many cities do not contain skyscrapers at present, this will change in the future. Likewise, more decoration, repair, and maintenance projects will emerge. Thus, the present research, which compares the safety… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of choosing alternatives, some papers used AHP-analytical hierarchical process to select the most optimal new purpose in the process of restoration and revitalization of historic buildings [37,38], while others used AHP for the most suitable historical buildings for protection [39]. On the other hand, AHP is often used to prioritize relevant risk issues or indicators regarding possible interventions and implementation of constructive measures [40,41]. Talking about the smart city framework, some authors have recognized AHP as a suitable MCDM technique for ranking criteria to provide qualitative guidelines for the development of smart cities or to identify the crucial barriers for smart strategies implementation [42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of choosing alternatives, some papers used AHP-analytical hierarchical process to select the most optimal new purpose in the process of restoration and revitalization of historic buildings [37,38], while others used AHP for the most suitable historical buildings for protection [39]. On the other hand, AHP is often used to prioritize relevant risk issues or indicators regarding possible interventions and implementation of constructive measures [40,41]. Talking about the smart city framework, some authors have recognized AHP as a suitable MCDM technique for ranking criteria to provide qualitative guidelines for the development of smart cities or to identify the crucial barriers for smart strategies implementation [42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More in detail, as pointed out in the previous sections, numerous examples of tools aimed at extracting information from accidents statistics and data can be found in literature. However, most of them require a subjective intervention of the analyst and/or of a panel of experts [86,87]. Conversely, this study considered a database (Infor.MO) where the type of information made available is standardized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming to compare safety risks between new projects and projects involving decoration, repair, and maintenance, Li et al studied the particular phenomena of Hong Kong construction worker generation gaps and extended working hours leading to construction accidents [16]. Based on the literature on building safety from 1999 to 2019, and using evidence-based practical methods and semi-structured interviews, this study aimed to compare the previous literature and analyze interviews with construction practitioners, court cases, and analytic hierarchy process investigations.…”
Section: Overview Of the Articles In The Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%