Ranking of soybean cultivars for resistance to ozone using different ozone doses and response measures

Heagle, Allen S.

doi:10.1016/0013-9327(79)90108-3

Cited by 20 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There has been little work on wild plants similar to that of Heagle (1979) in which relative ranking can be compared for different growth response measurements, but the data of Pearson et al (1996) agree with Heagle's conclusion that ranking depends on which measure is used. They compared the response of three populations of Plantago major from locations in the UK with different ozone climates (Lullington Heath, Great Dun Fell & Bush) and exposed them to five different ozone treatments.…”

Section: Relative Resistance -Growthmentioning

confidence: 65%

“…Furthermore, there is usually little relation between relative sensitivity in terms of visible symptoms and growth or seed production. Although a weak relationship has been reported between the percentage of injured leaves and change in biomass (FernandezBayon et al, 1992 ;Bergmann, Bender & Weigel, 1996), Heagle (1979) showed that the relative resistance ranking of soybean cvs was affected by the criterion used ; rankings based on growth effects were totally different from those based on foliar injury. , Mortensen & Nilsen (1992) and Mortensen (1993Mortensen ( , 1994 found many species in which there were significant effects of ozone on growth but no visible symptoms, so the absence of such symptoms does not mean that there is no effect on growth.…”

Section: Visible Symptomsmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of ozone on wild plants

1998

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although there is a great deal of concern about the effects of human activities on biodiversity, until recently there has been very little interest in the effects of ozone on the species that constitute the major part of the flora, the diverse herbaceous and shrubby species of natural and semi-natural communities. However, many wild species have been shown to be at least as sensitive to ozone as crops that show significant yield losses, so there is a pressing need for an evaluation of the risk to wild species posed by ozone. This review attempts to assess progress and highlight problems. It begins with a comment on semantics, discusses the difficulties involved in measuring relative ozone resistance and then proceeds to consider the effects of ozone on growth and resource allocation. The evidence for evolution of resistance is appraised and then the potential effects of several interactions (cutting\grazing, competition, soil water deficit and nutrition) are considered. The review ends with some remarks on observation of oxidant-induced changes in ecosystems.

show abstract

Section: Relative Resistance -Growthmentioning

confidence: 65%

Section: Visible Symptomsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Effects of ozone on wild plants

1998

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bell, 1988), often after exposure to high concentrations. However, in general, rankings using visible symptoms bear little relationship to those based on growth (Jensen & Masters, 1975;Heagle, 1979;Kress & Skelly, 1982;Kohut, Lawrence & Colavito, 1988). This ma}' he partly due to the fact that expression of symptoms is affected hy the weather, plant maturity and other stresses (Heck, Dunning & Hindawi, 1966;Haas, 1970,-Mukammal, Neumann & Hofstra, 1982Mehlhorn & Wellburn, 1987;Taylor et aL, 1988).…”

Section: Visible Symptomsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The response of native, herbaceous species to ozone: growth and fluorescence screening

1992

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYOzone concentrations in many parts of Europe exceed the proposed UN-ECE Critical Levels for the protection of ecosystems but there is so little known about the effects on native, herbaceous species, that it is presently impossible to judge what effect, if any, these concentrations are having on this group of plants. This paper reports the results of an initial screening of 32 taxa that was used to select a small number of species for further work. All were exposed to 70 nl 1"^ Og given for 7 h d"' for two weeks and the response measured in terms of nnean relative growth rate {R), the allometric root/shoot coefficient {K), and changes in induced chlorophyll fluorescence (/^).Only six species showed visible symptoms but 14 showed a significant reduction in R. There was no relationship between the extent of visible symptoms and growth reduction, confirming that visible symptoms are often of little value in determining growth sensitivity to O3 stress. There were marked differences within genera and within species; a population of Plantago major collected in Athens showed no effects, while a Derbyshire population, with a 24 % reduction in R, was the most sensitive of taxa tested, including Bel-W3 tobacco which has been specifically hred for O3 sensitivity.There was a significant regression of R\ change on the R of controls {R% = 12-4-104 x ^, P = 0-0007, r = -0-56), implying that > 30°(, of the variation in response between taxa was related to the inherent R; faster growing taxa tending to show a greater reduction in R on exposure to O3. It is tentatively suggested that this may be related to differences in stomatal conductance.Ozone caused a significant shift in K" in 14 taxa, with many of the biggest changes being in grasses. Although O3 reduced K in some taxa, contrary to several published accounts, it increased it in others, and in some there was an effect on K with no effect on R. Possible reasons for this are discussed.Chlorophyll fluorescence was examined as a tool for detecting Oj stress. The maximum rate of rise of induced fluorescence, Fj^, was very sensitive to O3 but showed a complex pattern of response dependent on species and time. Most taxa showed a significant change in Fj^, even when there was no effect of the O3 on R or K. Whilst the sensitivity of F^ makes it a useful method for in vivo detection of O3 stress, the complexity of the response makes it very difficult to quantify and use for comparisons between species.

show abstract

“…The sensitivity ranking of the species may differ should some of the environmental conditions change. For example, Heagle 7 reported that the ozone sensitivity of soybean cultivars varied with ozone concentrations, duration of exposure, and the response variable selected as the criterion for ranking. Drought 8 ' 9 temperature, 10 seed source and development stage 11 can also affect the response to gaseous pollutants and change sensitivity ranking.…”

Section: Relative Sensitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%