Ranking the Performance of Universities: The Role of Sustainability

Abstract

University rankings assess the performance of universities in various fields and aggregate that performance into a single value. In this way, the aggregate performance of universities can be easily compared. The importance of rankings is evident, as they often guide the policy of Higher Education Institutions. The most prestigious multi-criteria rankings use indicators related to teaching and research. However, many stakeholders are now demanding a greater commitment to sustainable development from universities, and it is therefore necessary to include sustainability criteria in university rankings. The development of multi-criteria rankings is subject to numerous criticisms, including the subjectivity of the decision makers when assigning weights to the criteria. In this paper we propose a methodology based on goal programming that allows objective, transparent and reproducible weighting of the criteria. Moreover, it avoids the problems associated with the existence of correlated criteria. The methodology is applied to a sample of 718 universities, using 11 criteria obtained from two prestigious university rankings covering sustainability, teaching and research. A sensitivity analysis is carried out to assess the robustness of the results obtained. This analysis shows how the weights of the criteria and the universities’ rank change depending on the λ parameter of the goal programming model, which is the only parameter set by the decision maker.

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Test Sustainable Development in University 4.0 in the Ultra-Smart Society Era

“…In terms of the advancement of sustainability, universities have evolved into crucial players [73,74]. In order to achieve this goal and focus on providing high-quality education, universities must change their roles, organizational structures, and leadership styles to meet the new demands of sustainability [75,76].…”

University 4.0 Sustainable Development in the Way of Society 5.0

“…Success involves more than just financial gain, recognition in the media, and student learning; it also involves fostering a sustainable society. Students should be familiar with how to run their lives on renewable energy, do away with the idea of trash, transform every waste product into a resource or nutrition for another species or activity, and recycle resources back into the natural cycles [83][84][85]. Universities are hubs for knowledge creation where the evolution of the human person and its surroundings are continuously assessed from the many fields of study [46,86].…”

Sustainability Ranking of Turkish Universities with Different Weighting Approaches and the TOPSIS Method

“…In recent years, economic globalization has had a significant impact on communities and organizations, and growing international competitiveness and social scrutiny have also impacted higher education institutions. In this context, stakeholders need more information to evaluate and compare universities' performance worldwide, and university rankings are widely used for simple and rapid comparison based on a selected set of characteristics [40] ranging from research and academic reputation to education and environmental performance. Of these three perspectives, most designers of university rankings generally prioritize research and academic reputation, followed by education-related indicators.…”