2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(09)60253-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RANS and PANEL method for unsteady flow propeller analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative error is 3.68%. But comparing with the literature [13], relative error of thrust is 4.29%, and relative error of torque is 0.57%. The error of thrust value is within 5%, and the two torque values are almost consistent.…”
Section: Analysis Of Unsteady Calculation Results Under the Oblique Flowmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relative error is 3.68%. But comparing with the literature [13], relative error of thrust is 4.29%, and relative error of torque is 0.57%. The error of thrust value is within 5%, and the two torque values are almost consistent.…”
Section: Analysis Of Unsteady Calculation Results Under the Oblique Flowmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…It shows that propeller load will increase in oblique flow. Additionally, the calculation results of RANS method from the literature [13,14] are also listed in Table 4. It can be seen that thrust calculation results in this paper are closer with the calculation results of the literature [14].…”
Section: Analysis Of Unsteady Calculation Results Under the Oblique Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Lighthill analogy, Proudmam proposed the following formula to compute the acoustic power of the turbulent flow, regardless of the average flow [36]. (5) In the above equation, u and l are the turbulence velocity and the length scale, respectively, while a 0 and α are the sound speed and a coefficient.…”
Section: Equations and Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, these methods require complex laboratory equipment and are very expensive, especially when fluctuating quantities are to be measured. On the other hand, numerical simulations (making use of both inviscid [5][6][7][8][9][10] and viscous flow methods [11][12][13][14][15]) are also widely represented in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two commonly used methods for numerically studying propeller exciting forces under nonuniform ship's wake. One is that the propeller is simulated separately from the hull using measured ship's wake [3][4][5] or simulated ship wake as velocity inlet boundary condition. Here, the measured ship's wake usually 2 Shock and Vibration refers to the nominal wake because the effective wake is difficult to measure in experiments for now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%