2016
DOI: 10.7249/rr1169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RAPAPORT (Resilience Assessment Process and Portfolio Option Reporting Tool): Background and Method

Abstract: Limited Print and Electronic Distribution RightsThis document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For inform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not to imply that allied or commercial partners do not have doctrine or policy but only that the USSF has no influence over a third party's doctrine and policy. 43 In the prior work that this analysis was inspired by (Dreyer et al, 2016), the authors developed a representation of the U.S. military space community as an arrangement of DOTmLPF-P nodes and used that network to reason about how U.S. investments in non-materiel means might impact resilience of U.S. space systems. At the time that work was performed (2015-2016), network analysis was quite immature.…”
Section: Modeling Partnerships With Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is not to imply that allied or commercial partners do not have doctrine or policy but only that the USSF has no influence over a third party's doctrine and policy. 43 In the prior work that this analysis was inspired by (Dreyer et al, 2016), the authors developed a representation of the U.S. military space community as an arrangement of DOTmLPF-P nodes and used that network to reason about how U.S. investments in non-materiel means might impact resilience of U.S. space systems. At the time that work was performed (2015-2016), network analysis was quite immature.…”
Section: Modeling Partnerships With Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, although we adopt the overall modeling approach from that work, we use standard network metrics to assess the resilience of the network. Furthermore, the goal of Dreyer et al (2016) was to identify how portfolio investments impact resilience, but our goal is to generate insights into how the independent qualitative factors we found impact partnership dynamics and, thus, mission resilience.…”
Section: Modeling Partnerships With Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some applications have been attempted in more social-behavioral settings, such as research by RAND and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory on trader be hav iors in the security industry (Dreyer et al, 2016), and in the analy sis of data from massively multiplayer online games (Jima and Lakkaraju, 2014). Other applications of agentbased modeling in electric-power networks are connecting phenomena at diff er ent scales, something of considerable interest to economists as well as regulators (Tesfatsion, 2018).…”
Section: Exploratory Research and Analy Sismentioning
confidence: 99%