2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.05.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and simple screening analysis for residual imidacloprid in agricultural products with commercially available ELISA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
50
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results was reported for imidacloprid, Fernandez-Alba et al (1996) reported that recovery percentage for imidacloprid were 123, 114 and 102% in pepper, tomato and cucumber fruits, respectively. Also, Watanabe et al (2004) found that the average rates of recovery for imidacloprid were 113.3, 88.0, 82.7 and 87.5% in cucumber, eggplant, lettuce and green pepper, respectively. Recovery percentages were used to correct data in residue studies for both insecticides.…”
Section: Recovery Of Imidaclopridmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar results was reported for imidacloprid, Fernandez-Alba et al (1996) reported that recovery percentage for imidacloprid were 123, 114 and 102% in pepper, tomato and cucumber fruits, respectively. Also, Watanabe et al (2004) found that the average rates of recovery for imidacloprid were 113.3, 88.0, 82.7 and 87.5% in cucumber, eggplant, lettuce and green pepper, respectively. Recovery percentages were used to correct data in residue studies for both insecticides.…”
Section: Recovery Of Imidaclopridmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Table 3 shows that the easiest method to avoid the matrix effect is dilution of the sample extract (mainly methanol extract) with water or phosphate buffer. The recovery from various measurement samples were generally good in all reports (Byrne et al, 2005;Eisenback et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2006;Ma et al, 2009;Watanabe et al, 2001;Watanabe et al, 2004aWatanabe et al, , 2004bWatanabe et al, , 2006Watanabe et al, , 2011Xu et al, 2010). The measurement sensitivity of ELISA is apt to be affected by the concentration of extraction solvent (mainly methanol) coexisting in the sample solution during measurement (Nunes et al, 1998).…”
Section: Elisa Analysis For Neonicotinoid Insecticides As a Rapid Andmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…can be used easily for monitoring tests of a specific neonicotinoid insecticide. However, it is important in the use of kit-based ELISA to remember that the matrix effect should be evaluated in advance (Byrne et al, 2005;Watanabe et al, 2004aWatanabe et al, , 2004bWatanabe et al, , 2006Watanabe et al, , 2011. In any event, when ELISA is applied to a sample, it might be affected by the matrix effect.…”
Section: Elisa Analysis For Neonicotinoid Insecticides As a Rapid Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, since all standard curves in diluted apple extracts substantially agreed with the control curves, the results suggest that any pesticides evaluated can be directly analyzed in the tested samples only by simple dilution of the extracts with water or water/methanol (9: 1) 29−32 . However, when the ELISA for imidacloprid was used to analyze spinach samples, avoiding matrix interference was difficult, even with additional dilution (data not shown) 30 . For such samples, a minimal sample pretreatment procedure such as SPE may be necessary to prevent matrix interference.…”
Section: Elimination or Minimization Of Interference From The Sample mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), which is based on highly specific or selective antigen-antibody interactions, gives a sensitive response against only one or a few trace level pesticides in various sample matrices, and is therefore a promising method for pesticide residue analysis 9,11,20,27 . Herein, I review the potential utility of ELISA for simple and rapid pesticide residue analysis in crops on the basis of previous research carried out in my laboratory to evaluate kit-based ELISAs for the neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid 29,30 , the organophosphorus insecticide fenitrothion 31 , and the fungicide chlorothalonil 32 ( Fig. 1) developed by Horiba Ltd. (Kyoto, Japan).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%