2019
DOI: 10.2112/jcoastres-d-19-00055.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Assessment of Shoreline Changes Induced by Tropical Cyclone Oma Using CubeSat Imagery in Southeast Queensland, Australia

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion of time‐varying parametrizations (and their uncertainty) offers the opportunity to ensure consistency between modeled coastal evolution drivers and the underlying physical processes (Toimil et al, 2020) and now warrants the EnKF application as a method to explore parameter changes and investigate strategies to improve shoreline models in view of climate variability. This is motivated by the advent of newly available global‐scale shoreline detection methods using satellite remote sensing (e.g., Kelly & Gontz, 2019; Vos, Harley, et al, 2019; Vos, Splinter, et al, 2019) and the increasing public availability of high‐resolution long‐term shoreline data sets (e.g., Ludka et al, 2019; Turner et al, 2016). It is anticipated that the approach presented here will be useful for exploring cross‐shore parameter variability as a first step for training model parameters and empirically relating their variability to natural changes in forcing (e.g., Splinter et al, 2014) to ensure model transferability during forecast periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of time‐varying parametrizations (and their uncertainty) offers the opportunity to ensure consistency between modeled coastal evolution drivers and the underlying physical processes (Toimil et al, 2020) and now warrants the EnKF application as a method to explore parameter changes and investigate strategies to improve shoreline models in view of climate variability. This is motivated by the advent of newly available global‐scale shoreline detection methods using satellite remote sensing (e.g., Kelly & Gontz, 2019; Vos, Harley, et al, 2019; Vos, Splinter, et al, 2019) and the increasing public availability of high‐resolution long‐term shoreline data sets (e.g., Ludka et al, 2019; Turner et al, 2016). It is anticipated that the approach presented here will be useful for exploring cross‐shore parameter variability as a first step for training model parameters and empirically relating their variability to natural changes in forcing (e.g., Splinter et al, 2014) to ensure model transferability during forecast periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, a number of studies have used optical satellite imagery (including the infrared portions of the electromagnetic spectrum) to map changes in shoreline position with increasing levels of automation. While manual digitalization of shoreline position is a reliable and accurate method, particularly on high-resolution images (Ford, 2013;Kelly and Gontz, 2019), it remains time-consuming and impractical when employed for long stretches of coastline with hundreds of revisits. Instead, modern methods exploit the contrast in spectral signature between water and land to automatically identify the shoreline.…”
Section: Optical Satellitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, a number of studies have used optical satellite imagery (including the infrared portions of the electromagnetic spectrum) to map changes in shoreline position with increasing levels of automation. While manual digitalization of shoreline position is a reliable and accurate method, particularly on high-resolution images (Ford, 2013;Kelly and Gontz, 2019), it remains time-consuming and impractical when employed for long stretches of coastline with hundreds of revisits. Instead, modern methods exploit the contrast in spectral signature between water and land to automatically identify the shoreline.…”
Section: Optical Satellitesmentioning
confidence: 99%