2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid characterisation of the inherent dispersibility of respirable powders using dry dispersion laser diffraction

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodology used was similar to the one reported by Jaffari et al except that the primary range employed was in the range of 0.12-4.51 bar to investigate the indacaterol Breezhaler particle distribution density when the primary pressure changed (19).…”
Section: Particle Size Measurement Using Dry Dispersion Laser Diffracmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology used was similar to the one reported by Jaffari et al except that the primary range employed was in the range of 0.12-4.51 bar to investigate the indacaterol Breezhaler particle distribution density when the primary pressure changed (19).…”
Section: Particle Size Measurement Using Dry Dispersion Laser Diffracmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of the most suitable sampling technique is driven by a number of different considerations including the total mass, number concentration, size distribution and chemical composition of the particles to be characterized in addition to the size distribution technique to be used [17][18][19]. When sampling powders, there are two types of sampling errors possible that can affect the particle size analysis [20]; (i) errors due to segregation of the bulk powder which can be prevented by suitable mixing and (ii) statistical errors that are due to random fluctuations and cannot be prevented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a). SS was a less cohesive powder, that is, required a smaller dispersing pressure compared with SX, which has recently been reported in formulation studies . The de‐agglomeration profile for SS was normalised (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%