2021
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid detection of platelet inhibition and dysfunction in traumatic brain injury: A prospective observational study

Abstract: Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the role of POC-PFTs in predicting outcome or stratifying trauma patients at a higher risk of bleeding who may subsequently benefit from platelet transfusion has not been established. Several observational studies using different POC-PFTs found conflicting results regarding the severity of trauma and prognostic information that various tests may provide [ 134 , 136 138 ]. In a prospective study including 221 patients with traumatic intracranial haemorrhage (TICH), patients with nonresponsive platelets had similar in-hospital mortality [3 (3.0%) vs. 6 (6.3%), p = 0.324], TICH progression [26 (27.1%) vs. 24 (26.1%), p = 0.877], intensive care unit admission rates [34 (34.3%) vs. 38 (40.0%), p = 0.415] and length of stay [3 (interquartile range, 2–8) vs. 3.2 (interquartile range, 2–7) days, p = 0.818] as those with responsive platelets [ 136 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, the role of POC-PFTs in predicting outcome or stratifying trauma patients at a higher risk of bleeding who may subsequently benefit from platelet transfusion has not been established. Several observational studies using different POC-PFTs found conflicting results regarding the severity of trauma and prognostic information that various tests may provide [ 134 , 136 138 ]. In a prospective study including 221 patients with traumatic intracranial haemorrhage (TICH), patients with nonresponsive platelets had similar in-hospital mortality [3 (3.0%) vs. 6 (6.3%), p = 0.324], TICH progression [26 (27.1%) vs. 24 (26.1%), p = 0.877], intensive care unit admission rates [34 (34.3%) vs. 38 (40.0%), p = 0.415] and length of stay [3 (interquartile range, 2–8) vs. 3.2 (interquartile range, 2–7) days, p = 0.818] as those with responsive platelets [ 136 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several observational studies using different POC-PFTs found conflicting results regarding the severity of trauma and prognostic information that various tests may provide [ 134 , 136 138 ]. In a prospective study including 221 patients with traumatic intracranial haemorrhage (TICH), patients with nonresponsive platelets had similar in-hospital mortality [3 (3.0%) vs. 6 (6.3%), p = 0.324], TICH progression [26 (27.1%) vs. 24 (26.1%), p = 0.877], intensive care unit admission rates [34 (34.3%) vs. 38 (40.0%), p = 0.415] and length of stay [3 (interquartile range, 2–8) vs. 3.2 (interquartile range, 2–7) days, p = 0.818] as those with responsive platelets [ 136 ]. In contrast, a systematic review including 16 studies on adult patients with TBI (isolated or polytrauma) indicates that TEG-PM assays are associated with mortality and bleeding complications, but points to the low quality of current evidence in this population [ 127 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…71,[91][92][93] Even given the limitations of available routine laboratory coagulation assays, such a protocol may be helpful to provide an initial assessment of the coagulation to screen for inherited coagulation disorders and/or potential use of anticoagulants. [94][95][96][97] Limitations of laboratory tests, particularly in severe trauma, should be considered. This includes the fact that colloids and fibrinolysis may alter prothrombin time, activated PTT, and fibrinogen assays.…”
Section: Standard and Advanced Laboratory Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies demonstrate an inability to predict mortality or hemorrhagic lesion expansion using these assays. 8 , 9 , 10 In a study of patients taking antiplatelets medications by Alvikas et al., 11 assay confirmation of platelet inhibition was not associated with poor outcomes. However, a retrospective study by Miles et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%