“…Ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy (UV‐vis) (Diniz, Barbosa, De Melo Milanez, Pistonesi, & De Araújo, 2016; Yu & He, 2018), near‐infrared spectroscopy (Chen, Zhao, Zhang, & Wang, 2006, 2007; Zhao, Chen, Huang, & Fang, 2006), Fourier transform infrared (FT‐IR) spectroscopy (Li, Sun, Luo, & He, 2015, 2016), Raman spectroscopy (Li et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2020), laser‐induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) (Yu, Peng, Liu, & He, 2017), and terahertz (Chen, Cao, & Liu, 2011) in spectroscopic techniques, electric nose (E‐nose) (Chen, Liu, Zhao, & Ouyang, 2013; Dutta, Hines, Gardner, Kashwan, & Bhuyan, 2003), electric tongue (E‐tongue) (Zhi, Zhao, & Zhang, 2017), electric eye (E‐eye) (Xu, Wang, & Zhu, 2019), adsorptive stripping voltammetry (ASV) (Guo, Zheng, Mo, & Ye, 2009), cyclic voltammetry (CV) (Kilmartin & Hsu, 2003; Liu et al., 2014), square‐wave voltammetry (SWV) (Novak, Šeruga, & Komorsky‐Lovrić, 2010), and capillary zone electrophoresis (Horie, Mukai, & Kohata, 1997) in electrochemical methods, nanozymes (Wang, Liu, Qin, Chen, & Shen, 2016; Zhang & Huang, 2015), computer vision (Wang et al., 2015; Xu, Wang, & Gu, 2019; Ye et al., 2019), and modified chromatographic techniques are the five main emerging techniques for quality and safety evaluation of tea products, determining parameters qualitatively and quantitatively, with their distinct advantages and disadvantages, as well as suitable but different detection target. To the best of our knowledge, no study has reviewed the applications of these emerging techniques for the evaluation of different parameters in tea products.…”