2000
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.38.11.4066-4071.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Detection of West Nile Virus from Human Clinical Specimens, Field-Collected Mosquitoes, and Avian Samples by a TaqMan Reverse Transcriptase-PCR Assay

Abstract: The authors report on the development and application of a rapid TaqMan assay for the detection of West Nile (WN) virus in a variety of human clinical specimens and field-collected specimens. Oligonucleotide primers and FAM- and TAMRA-labeled WN virus-specific probes were designed by using the nucleotide sequence of the New York 1999 WN virus isolate. The TaqMan assay was compared to a traditional reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR assay and to virus isolation in Vero cells with a large number (≈500) of specimens … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
406
1
18

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 975 publications
(426 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
406
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…We and others have found the consistently low inter-assay and intra-assay variability especially useful compared to other assays (Schutten et al, 2000;Nitsche et al, 2000;Locatelli et al, 2000). Real-time PCR also has equivalent or improved sensitivity compared to microbial culture, or conventional single-round and nested PCR (Kearns et al, 2001c;Clarke et al, 2002;Kupferschmidt et al, 2001;Kennedy et al, 1997b;Locatelli et al, 2000;Capone et al, 2001;Leutenegger et al, 1999;Smith et al, 2001;Monopoeho et al, 2000;van Elden et al, 2001;Lanciotti et al, 2000). It has been reported to be at least as sensitive as Southern blot, still considered by some as the gold standard for probe-based hybridisation assays (Capone et al, 2001).…”
Section: Real-time Fluorescent Pcrmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We and others have found the consistently low inter-assay and intra-assay variability especially useful compared to other assays (Schutten et al, 2000;Nitsche et al, 2000;Locatelli et al, 2000). Real-time PCR also has equivalent or improved sensitivity compared to microbial culture, or conventional single-round and nested PCR (Kearns et al, 2001c;Clarke et al, 2002;Kupferschmidt et al, 2001;Kennedy et al, 1997b;Locatelli et al, 2000;Capone et al, 2001;Leutenegger et al, 1999;Smith et al, 2001;Monopoeho et al, 2000;van Elden et al, 2001;Lanciotti et al, 2000). It has been reported to be at least as sensitive as Southern blot, still considered by some as the gold standard for probe-based hybridisation assays (Capone et al, 2001).…”
Section: Real-time Fluorescent Pcrmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The virus specific real time PCR mix for all viruses except rabies virus (RV) was composed of 1× QuantiTect Virus + ROX Vial Kit (Qiagen, Manchester, UK), forward and reverse primers at a final concentration of 0.4 M and virus specific TaqMan probe at a final concentration of 0.2 M, 1× ROX, 3 l of template DNA and water to total a volume of 20 l (Mcgoldrick et al, 1998;Lanciotti et al, 2000;Marriott et al, 2006;Bilk et al, 2012) The thermal profile used was 95 • C for 5 min and 45 cycles of 95 • C for 15 s, 60 • C for 45 s. The 18S rRNA real time PCR was performed using 0.6 l 18S rRNA primers/probe mix (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK), the Quan-tiTect Virus + ROX Vial Kit as described above and 2 l template DNA. For RV, 10 l Brilliant ® II SYBR ® Green QPCR with low ROX master mix (Agilent Technologies, Cheshire, UK) was used with JW12 and N165-146 primers, each totalling a final concentration of 1 M, 3 l template DNA and water to a final volume of 20 l (Wakeley et al, 2005).…”
Section: Quantitative Pcr (Qpcr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant number of real-time PCR assays have been developed and applied for detection, quantification, and diVerentiation of viruses inducing a wide range of human and animal diseases such as coronavirus [139], flaviviruses [140][141][142], gyrovirus [21], hepadnaviruses [143,144], herpesviruses [145][146][147], orthomyxoviruses [148], parvoviruses [149], papovaviruses [150], paramyxoviruses [8], picornaviruses [151,152], poxviruses [153], retroviruses [154,155], and rhabdoviruses [156].…”
Section: Viral Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%