2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.12.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid dry-reagent immunomagnetic biosensing platform based on volumetric detection of nanoparticles on 3D structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy can indicate systematic errors in a system and was calculated by comparing the concentrations measured with different spiking concentrations. The system accuracy was tested by detecting five concentrations (1,10,50,200, and 500 mIU mL −1 ) of HCG standard solutions (with three strips for each concentration), where each strip was inserted into the reader 10 times and the average value and standard deviation were calculated for each concentration. System accuracy was evaluated by calculating recovery as the ratio of the average detected concentration and standard concentration.…”
Section: Accuracy Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy can indicate systematic errors in a system and was calculated by comparing the concentrations measured with different spiking concentrations. The system accuracy was tested by detecting five concentrations (1,10,50,200, and 500 mIU mL −1 ) of HCG standard solutions (with three strips for each concentration), where each strip was inserted into the reader 10 times and the average value and standard deviation were calculated for each concentration. System accuracy was evaluated by calculating recovery as the ratio of the average detected concentration and standard concentration.…”
Section: Accuracy Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach can be employed to detect the whole test zone (three-dimensional) even when the test zone is opaque and has a high "signal-to-noise" ratio because only a weak magnetic background signal is generated by biological samples. Several magnetic quantification methods using ICTSs have been reported, such as giant magnetoresistance (GMR) sensor-based methods [45][46][47][48], tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) sensor-based methods [49], and coil-based methods [43,50,51]. Particularly, Marquina et al [47] used a GMR sensor-based method to quantitatively detect human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), but this method showed low sensitivity, considerable noise, and a complex reuse process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…exciting the reporters with a combination of two frequencies with magnetic fields strong enough to saturate the material [13,14]. With the exception of an exceedingly complex detection modality (not suitable for routine field applications) applied in conjunction with a conventional ac susceptometer [15], there are no published reports of magnetic nanoparticle inductive detection sensitivities approaching the femtoMag within 1000-fold. A benchtop susceptometer can detect ~60 billion 50 nm superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles (20 μg) [16], while microfabricated planar coil sensors can detect 2 million 400 nm superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles (0.3 μg) [17,18].…”
Section: Pcb-based Magnetometermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25, 26 Similarly, alternate methods to modulate the flow of reporters through the strip have been proposed, including electrophoresis, 27 isotachophoresis, 28 and flow delay. 29 Finally, proposed ultrasensitive readouts include volumetric magnetization, 30, 31 near-infrared detection, 32 surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, 33 fluorescence, 34, 35 chemiluminescence, 9, 36 phosphorescence 37 , and thermal contrast. 38 In addition, much recent work has focused on smartphone-compatible readouts 39, 40 that are suitable for settings lacking sophisticated laboratory infrastructure or instrumentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%