2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid estimation of recharge potential in ephemeral-stream channels using electromagnetic methods, and measurements of channel and vegetation characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors that must be characterised accurately to achieve this goal include streambed heterogeneity (Fleckenstein et al, 2006;Kalbus et al, 2009;Schmidt et al, 2006), streambed geometry (Batlle-Aguilar and Cook, 2012;Callegary et al, 2007;Mudd, 2006), and groundwater depth (Izbicki et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors that must be characterised accurately to achieve this goal include streambed heterogeneity (Fleckenstein et al, 2006;Kalbus et al, 2009;Schmidt et al, 2006), streambed geometry (Batlle-Aguilar and Cook, 2012;Callegary et al, 2007;Mudd, 2006), and groundwater depth (Izbicki et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between EC a and particle size distribution was utilized by Callegary et al (2007a) to estimate potential for ephemeral stream channel infiltration and subsurface horizontal flow. Callegary et al (2007a) found a generally poor correlation between EC a and point measurements of particle size, infiltration flux, and saturated hydraulic conductivity but found moderate correlation between EC a measurements and the boreholeaveraged percent of fines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low‐induction‐number frequency‐domain electromagnetic‐induction instruments are used widely for mapping and correlating apparent soil electrical conductivity (σ a ) with a variety of soil properties such as soil quality (Corwin and Lesch, 2005), recharge potential (Callegary et al, 2007b), soil texture and water holding capacity (Abdu et al, 2008), water table depth (Buchanan and Triantafilis, 2009), soil moisture dynamics (Robinson et al, 2009), paleochannels, salinity, and soil profiles (Triantafilis and Monteiro‐Santos, 2010), and subsurface lateral flow paths (Zhu and Lin, 2009). The LIN FEM instruments are often referred to as EMI instruments, but not all EMI instruments are LIN FEM instruments, so in the context of this discussion, we will use the more specific term.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%