2019
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid growth and large body size in annual fish populations are compromised by density‐dependent regulation

Abstract: We tested the effect of population density on maximum body size in three sympatric species of annual killifishes Nothobranchius spp. from African ephemeral pools. We found a clear negative effect of population density on body size, limiting their capacity for extremely fast development and rapid growth. This suggests that density‐dependent population regulation and the ephemeral character of their habitat impose contrasting selective pressures on the life history of annual killifishes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2017) and in the wild (Lorenzen and Enberg 2002; Vrtílek et al. 2019) and if body size has a stronger plastic response than brain size, this could potentially affect relative brain size. As the fast‐ and slow‐living species differ in terms of growth (Sowersby et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2017) and in the wild (Lorenzen and Enberg 2002; Vrtílek et al. 2019) and if body size has a stronger plastic response than brain size, this could potentially affect relative brain size. As the fast‐ and slow‐living species differ in terms of growth (Sowersby et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sexually mature) adults in mixed-sex groups. However, rearing density has previously been found to suppress growth rates in fish, both in the laboratory (Ribas et al 2017) and in the wild (Lorenzen and Enberg 2002;Vrtílek et al 2019) and if body size has a stronger plastic response than brain size, this could potentially affect relative brain size. As the fast-and slowliving species differ in terms of growth (Sowersby et al preprint), it is plausible that plastic effects (suppression of growth) will be stronger in those species with faster growth rates (Auld et al 2010).…”
Section: Growth Rate and Brain Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wet body mass was measured to the nearest 0.01 g by wiping each fish with a wet towel in a hand net before placing on the balance (PCB 350-3, Kern, Germany). Visual representations of body size growth for wild fish were used from Vrtílek et al (2019). The thermal unit growth coefficient (TGC) was used as the least biased growth parameter (Lugert et al, 2016), estimated from sexspecific differences in mean body size from two measurements.…”
Section: Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This outcome may affect size‐selective events, such as winter mortality, predation risk, interspecific competition, and reproduction (Einum & Fleming, ). Interspecific resource competition can affect growth patterns and timing of sexual maturation to a degree that the effects can be higher than those of climate (Rollinson, Kaye, & Canham, ; Vrtílek, Žák, Polačik, Blažek, & Reichard, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interspecific resource competition can affect growth patterns and timing of sexual maturation to a degree that the effects can be higher than those of climate (Rollinson, Kaye, & Canham, 2016;Vrtílek, Žák, Polačik, Blažek, & Reichard, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%