Rapid humanitarian assessments and rationality: a value‐of‐information study from Iraq, 2003‐04

Abstract

Rapid assessments are one of the standard informational tools in humanitarian response and are supposed to contribute to rational decision-making.(1) The extent to which the assessment organisation itself behaves rationally, however, is an open question. This can be evaluated against multiple criteria, such as the cost and value of the information it collects and its ability to adapt flexibly design or samples when the survey environment changes unforeseeably. An unusual data constellation from two concurrent recent (2003-04) rapid assessments in northern Iraq permits us to model part of the actual assessment behaviour in terms of geographical, community and prior substantive information attributes. The model correctly predicts the decisions, in 79 per cent of the 2,425 local communities in focus, that data collector teams in the Emergency Mine Action Survey made to visit or not to visit. The analysis demonstrates variably rational behaviour under conditions of insecurity, repeated regrouping and incomplete sampling frames. A pronounced bias towards very small rural settlements is irrational for the overall results, but may be a rational strategy of individual survey workers seeking to prolong their employment. Implications for future assessments are sketched in the areas of tools for urban surveys, greater adaptability, including early feedback from users, and sensibility to value-of-information concepts.

Long-term maintenance of grasslands on dairy farms is associated with redesign and hybridisation of practices, motivated by farmers' perceptions

“…The environmental and agronomic scores were therefore calculated by summing the products of the percentage of UAA in rotations that include grasslands and the aggregated score of the associated grassland type. To compare the agronomic and environmental roles of grasslands on the farms, the sums obtained were normalised (Benini, 2012) according to the theoretical maximum that could be obtained. Table 5.…”

Agility in Disaster Relief: A Social Construction Approach

“…Following each disaster is an urgent need for critical supplies, although what is needed may not always be clear (Apte, ). Supplies are expected to arrive in a timely, yet rapid manner, based on the idea that “victims cannot wait” (Benini & Conley, , p. 30).…”

“…In the initial response stage, aid agency experts assess damage and need, compiling lists of goods that are immediately required (Thomas & Kopczak, ). Experts examine nutritional needs, displaced populations, and the state of basic infrastructure (Benini & Conley, ). Survivors participate little in this process, and have minimal influence over which supplies come to the area (Argollo da Costa, Campos, & Albergaria de Mello Bandeira, ).…”

Assessment of Emergency Response in the Incident of Building Collapse in Selected Location in Lagos State

“…[8] opined that the speed of aid to disaster victims is highly pivotal to their survival. [9] also claims that speed is universally valued on the premise that the victims cannot wait. Hence, [10] stated that it is essential to put in place a working framework to deal with emergency occurrences.…”