1993
DOI: 10.3109/00313029309066597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid identification of mycobacteria by the gen-probe accuprobesystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since PCR detection commonly suffers from severe contamination problems, the SAT-TB assay should reduce the risk of laboratory contamination and false-positive results (1). The SAT-TB assay uses the same principles of isothermal RNA amplification as the MTD assay (12,18,21,25,27,28,35,39). NAA based on isothermal amplification of RNA has been used to detect several pathogens, including M. tuberculosis, human immunodeficiency virus type 1, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (10,16,24,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since PCR detection commonly suffers from severe contamination problems, the SAT-TB assay should reduce the risk of laboratory contamination and false-positive results (1). The SAT-TB assay uses the same principles of isothermal RNA amplification as the MTD assay (12,18,21,25,27,28,35,39). NAA based on isothermal amplification of RNA has been used to detect several pathogens, including M. tuberculosis, human immunodeficiency virus type 1, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (10,16,24,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, many of these methods are not only time-consuming but they have poor accuracy. As a result, these have been augmented by molecular-based methods in the United States, which include commercially available DNA probes (7)(8)(9) and DNA sequencing of a variety of target genes (e.g., 16S rRNA genes and rpoB) (10)(11)(12). While accurate, these methods are expensive to perform and may not necessarily be cost-effective in populations of low mycobacterial prevalence (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional identification of mycobacterial species has mainly relied on phenotypic and biochemical traits. More recent methods involve the chromatographic analysis of mycolic acid profiles or the use of DNA probes which target the most common Mycobacterium species (7)(8)(9)(10). To date, the gold standard for species identification remains DNA sequencing of 16S rRNA, rpoB, and/or hsp65 genes (11,12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%