Rapid literature mapping on the recent use of machine learning for wildlife imagery

Abstract

Machine (especially deep) learning algorithms are changing the way wildlife imagery is processed. They dramatically speed up the time to detect, count, and classify animals and their behaviours. Yet, we currently have very few systematic literature surveys on its use in wildlife imagery. Through a literature survey (a 'rapid' review) and bibliometric mapping, we explored its use across: 1) species (vertebrates), 2) image types (e.g., camera traps, or drones), 3) study locations, 4) alternative machine learning algorithms, 5) outcomes (e.g., recognition, classification, or tracking), 6) reporting quality and openness, 7) author affiliation, and 8) publication journal types. We found that an increasing number of studies used convolutional neural networks (i.e., deep learning). Typically, studies have focused on large charismatic or iconic mammalian species. An increasing number of studies have been published in ecology-specific journals indicating the uptake of deep learning to transform the detection, classification and tracking of wildlife. Sharing of code was limited, with only 20% of studies providing links to analysis code. Much of the published research and focus on animals came from India, China, Australia, or the USA. There were relatively few collaborations across countries. Given the power of machine learning, we recommend increasing collaboration and sharing approaches to utilise increasing amounts of wildlife imagery more rapidly and transform and improve understanding of wildlife behaviour and conservation. Our survey, augmented with bibliometric analyses, provides valuable signposts for future studies to resolve and address shortcomings, gaps, and biases.

Multi-Object Tracking in Heterogeneous environments (MOTHe) for animal video recordings

“…The efficiency of performing such tasks manually often increases dramatically with increasing dataset size. Therefore, increasingly, automated tools are being developed to detect and track animals ( Pérez-Escudero et al, 2014 ; Risse et al, 2017a ; Mönck et al, 2018 ; Sridhar, Roche & Gingins, 2018 ; Rodriguez et al, 2018 ; Yamanaka & Takeuchi, 2018 ; Itskovits et al, 2017 ; Walter & Couzin, 2021 ; Nakagawa et al, 2022 ).…”

Predicting chronic wasting disease in white-tailed deer at the county scale using machine learning

“…Among these technologies are machine learning (ML) techniques 20 , which are already revolutionizing analyses in wildlife conservation 21,22 . For example, deep learning has used wildlife imagery to propel detection, inventory, and classification of animals 23 . Full implementation of ML technologies into wildlife science, however, is slowed by our limited ability to rapidly generate high-resolution and standardized data across complex ecologies 24 .…”