1992
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030416.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Loss of Genetic Variation in Large Captive Populations of Drosophila Flies: Implications for the Genetic Management of Captive Populations

Abstract: Levels of variation in eight large captive populations of D. melanogaster (census sizes ∼ 5000) that had been in captivity for periods from 6 months to 23 years (8 to 365 generations) were estimated from allozyme heterozygosities, lethal frequencies, and inversion heterozygosities and phenotypic variances, additive genetic variances (VA), and heritabilities (h2) for sternopleural bristle numbers. Correlations between all measures of variation except lethal frequencies were high and significant. All measures of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
98
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory populations can be exposed to both laboratory selection (Hoffmann et al 2001) and genetic drift when kept at low population sizes (Briscoe et al 1992). The population used in the current study was kept at high population sizes (2Ð 3,000), making it unlikely to be severely affected by genetic drift.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory populations can be exposed to both laboratory selection (Hoffmann et al 2001) and genetic drift when kept at low population sizes (Briscoe et al 1992). The population used in the current study was kept at high population sizes (2Ð 3,000), making it unlikely to be severely affected by genetic drift.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the derived measures H O and H E theoretically do not have a normal distribution, the empirical distribution of the residuals did follow a normal distribution as assumed in ANOVA. The loss of expected heterozygosity and loss of alleles over the generations were estimated by regression analysis using the natural logarithm of H E or the total number of alleles (Briscoe et al, 1992). After fitting the generation we added the term locus.…”
Section: B Gautschi Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the NCARL nondiapausing strain, the same strain as the Standard Strain used here, was reported to have lost 15Ð39% of its genetic diversity compared with wild populations of D. v. virgifera (Kim et al 2007). This loss of genetic diversity is not unique to D. v. virgifera as strains of laboratory reared Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae) were shown to have less genetic diversity than wild populations (Briscoe et al 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%