2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03446.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid optical variability in radio-quiet QSOs

Abstract: A B S T R A C TWe report results of the observations at the Vainu Bappu Observatory and the Uttar Pradesh State Observatory of eight radio-quiet quasi-stellar objects (RQQSOs) during 1996±99. This is a part of our ongoing programme to search for intranight optical variability in RQQSOs. Additional evidence for very rapid variability in three of the five optically bright and very luminous RQQSOs we had observed earlier, 10492006, 14441408 and 16301377, was found. Of the three newly observed RQQSOs, the data for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(48 reference statements)
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is statistically improbable that a significant number of random stars will turn out to be variable on time‐scales of an hour or so. Such comparison star variations are indeed reported in studies, where the quasar of interest is also sometimes found to vary similarly (Gopal‐Krishna et al 1995; Sagar et al 1996; Gopal‐Krishna et al 2000; GK03; S03). In any case, for those objects, for which evidence for short‐term variability is presented, an independent confirmation is by all means required.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…It is statistically improbable that a significant number of random stars will turn out to be variable on time‐scales of an hour or so. Such comparison star variations are indeed reported in studies, where the quasar of interest is also sometimes found to vary similarly (Gopal‐Krishna et al 1995; Sagar et al 1996; Gopal‐Krishna et al 2000; GK03; S03). In any case, for those objects, for which evidence for short‐term variability is presented, an independent confirmation is by all means required.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This work provided the first positive detection of INOV for RQQs, though modest evidence for such variations had been obtained earlier (e.g. Gopal‐Krishna, Sagar & Wiita 1995; Sagar, Gopal‐Krishna & Wiita 1996; Jang & Miller 1997; Gopal‐Krishna et al 2000). It was, moreover, found that except for BLs and high optical polarization CDQs (HP‐CDQs), the amplitude of detected INOV is small (≤3 per cent) and so is the INOV duty cycle (DC; ∼10–20 per cent), irrespective of the radio loudness.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Unfortunately, such micro-arcsec scales are beyond the reach of any existing imaging telescopes and the only way to probe the conditions at such small scales is through flux variability observations. Though intra-night optical variability (INOV) was convincingly established for blazars over a decade ago (Miller, Carini & Goodrich 1989), the question of whether RQQs too show INOV has remained controversial (Gopal- Krishna et al 1995Krishna et al , 2000Jang & Miller 1995Rabbette et al 1998, de Diego et al 1998; Romero et al 1999). The cause of INOV is still a much debated issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%