2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40489-019-00175-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Prompting Method and Autism Spectrum Disorder: Systematic Review Exposes Lack of Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RPM has faced considerable criticism regarding the potentially dangerous consequences of its use, specifically the potential for prompter interference to be misconstrued as organic communication from a vulnerable individual (Hemsley, 2016; Tostanoski et al, 2014). Schlosser et al (2019) completed a systematic review of RPM to examine the developer’s claims of effectiveness. Authors were unable to draw conclusions of the effectiveness of RPM, as all six studies included in this review demonstrated significant methodological flaws which prohibited outcome analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPM has faced considerable criticism regarding the potentially dangerous consequences of its use, specifically the potential for prompter interference to be misconstrued as organic communication from a vulnerable individual (Hemsley, 2016; Tostanoski et al, 2014). Schlosser et al (2019) completed a systematic review of RPM to examine the developer’s claims of effectiveness. Authors were unable to draw conclusions of the effectiveness of RPM, as all six studies included in this review demonstrated significant methodological flaws which prohibited outcome analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, empty reviews have been published in several fields, including autism spectrum disorder [ 76 ], diabetic neuropathy [ 87 ], educational strategies in the context of frailty prevention and management [ 86 ], nursing [ 88 ], and tactical periodization in sport [ 82 ]. Until August of 2010, empty reviews comprised 8.7% of active reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and 45 of the 53 Review Groups had at least one empty review [ 72 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, it is important for science that all data is published, to promote a more balanced account of the phenomena being studied [73][74][75]. Specifically, empty reviews are relevant and useful for the advancement of evidence-based practices, highlighting major research gaps [71,72,76,77]. For example, long-standing traditions (e.g., clinical practices; position stands) may be exposed as not being sustained by evidence, and this may justify funding for performing future research on the topic [28,72,78].…”
Section: The Implications Of An Empty Review For the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the last 25 years more than 19 rigorous experimental studies have demonstrated that the origin of the communication is the facilitator, not the person with a disability (Ganz et al, 2017), and it is primarily viewed as a discredited instructional method. However, adapted forms of the FC approach have emerged recently under titles such as rapid prompting method and supported typing (Pena, 2019 ), with rigorous systematic reviews again finding no evidence of effects (Schlosser et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Ineffective Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%