1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1095-0397(99)00003-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Quantitative Analysis of Individual 18FDG-PET Scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this shortcoming, a variety of observer‐independent analysis methods have been studied, including SPM and three‐dimensional stereotactic surface projections (12). SPM is now widely used for analyzing functional brain images and has been applied to FDG‐PET (13), especially for cases of TLE (14). This approach reduced observer variability, but the methods were still not fully objective because they lacked information about anatomic structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this shortcoming, a variety of observer‐independent analysis methods have been studied, including SPM and three‐dimensional stereotactic surface projections (12). SPM is now widely used for analyzing functional brain images and has been applied to FDG‐PET (13), especially for cases of TLE (14). This approach reduced observer variability, but the methods were still not fully objective because they lacked information about anatomic structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction of quantitative methods to analyze 18 F-FDG-PET data has refined this information and provided a more precise topographical understanding of the regional vulnerability and severity of the metabolic insult in various neurological disorders and in focal epilepsy (Cummings et al, 1995;Duncan et al, 1997;Engel, 1984;McMurtray et al, 2008;Rintahaka et al, 1993;Schapiro et al, 1992). Quantitative analysis of imaging data can be achieved by Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM), an effective, objective, and reliable method that supplements visual interpretation (Salek-Haddadi et al, 2003;Swartz et al, 1999). This quantitative method provides a voxel based analysis of metabolic activity that permits whole brain global analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, visual evaluation of FDG PET images strongly depends on the experience of the interpreter, particularly in case of modest alterations of brain metabolism in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. Therefore, automatic anatomical standardization and voxel-based statistical evaluation are being increasingly used for the evaluation of brain PET scans [8][9][10][11][12]. These new techniques allow automated and operator-independent evaluation of brain PET scans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%