2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/20066780e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid-response mode VLT/UVES spectroscopy of GRB 060418 (Corrigendum)

Abstract: We have recently realized that, in Eq. (3) in Vreeswijk et al. (2007), the flux F ν (τ 0 ) should be divided by 4 π. The relation should therefore read as follows:Using this relation, our excitation program is now fully consistent with the PopRatio code (Silva & Viegas 2002, see also Sect. 5.2) when neglecting collisional excitation, and in the optically thin regime as PopRatio assumes all transitions are optically thin. The consequence is that excitation is a factor of 4 π less effective than we had previousl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
4
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with distances inferred from variable fine-structure lines for other bursts (e.g. Vreeswijk et al 2007;D'Elia et al 2007;Vreeswijk et al 2011;De Cia et al 2012). The X-ray and UV afterglow may destroy dust out to ∼100 pc, but this is not always the case as discussed in Fruchter et al (2001).…”
Section: Origin and Variability Of The Flux Dropsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is consistent with distances inferred from variable fine-structure lines for other bursts (e.g. Vreeswijk et al 2007;D'Elia et al 2007;Vreeswijk et al 2011;De Cia et al 2012). The X-ray and UV afterglow may destroy dust out to ∼100 pc, but this is not always the case as discussed in Fruchter et al (2001).…”
Section: Origin and Variability Of The Flux Dropsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As our team has already performed such modelling on GRB 060418 (at z = 1.490, Vreeswijk et al 2007Vreeswijk et al , 2011, we can readily determine this limit on H  for this sightline. The UV34 triplet is not detected in the GRB 060418 UVES spectra, with a 3σ upper limit on the rest-frame equivalent width (column density) of 0.03 Å (log N = 12.6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are, however, two major differences. First, we include the correct excitation flux (see the erratum published by Vreeswijk et al 2011), resulting in a distance decrease of √ 4π with respect to the old excitation calculation. Second, instead of calculating the excitation at line centre only, we effectively integrate over the full line profile to obtain the actual flux that is entering a particular layer.…”
Section: Photo-excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the very high column densities of gas regularly detected in GRB afterglow spectra (e.g., Jensen et al 2001;Hjorth et al 2003a;Vreeswijk et al 2004;Jakobsson et al 2006) and their direct link to star-formation (e.g., Galama et al 1998;Hjorth et al 2003b), this low detection rate of H 2 was initially quite surprising. Because the material probed by GRB-DLAs is in many cases located at distances of several hundred parsecs or more from the γ-ray burst (e.g., Vreeswijk et al 2007Vreeswijk et al , 2011D'Elia et al 2009;Sheffer et al 2009), the afterglow's UV flux itself will not photo-dissociate the H 2 of the GRB-DLA (e.g., Tumlinson et al 2007; Ledoux et al 2009). A genuine deficit of molecular hydrogen in GRB-DLAs as compared to QSO-DLAs for example, would instead indicate that H 2 is absent already prior to the burst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%