Rapid Review and Meta-Meta-Analysis of Self-Guided Interventions to Address Anxiety, Depression, and Stress During COVID-19 Social Distancing

Abstract

We conducted a rapid review and quantitative summary of meta-analyses that have examined interventions which can be used by individuals during quarantine and social distancing to manage anxiety, depression, stress, and subjective well-being. A literature search yielded 34 meta-analyses (total number of studies k = 1,390, n = 145,744) that were summarized. Overall, self-guided interventions showed small to medium effects in comparison to control groups. In particular, self-guided therapeutic approaches (including cognitive-behavioral, mindfulness, and acceptance-based interventions), selected positive psychology interventions, and multi-component and activity-based interventions (music, physical exercise) showed promising evidence for effectiveness. Overall, self-guided interventions on average did not show the same degree of effectiveness as traditional guided individual or group therapies. There was no consistent evidence of dose effects, baseline differences, and differential effectiveness of eHealth interventions. More research on the effectiveness of interventions in diverse cultural settings is needed.

A diary study of impulsive buying during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Control variables: In the baseline survey, we controlled the participants' demographic characteristics including gender, age, and monthly income, as prior research noted that these variables always impact impulsive buying behavior (He et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2019;Vohs & Faber, 2007). In addition, the health status was also controlled, as a good health status could have affected the emotions and behavior of participants during the COVID-19 pandemic (Fischer et al, 2020).…”

“…In early 2020, a novel pandemic (COVID-19) raged in Wuhan, China, and swiftly spread all over the world, rapidly becoming a worldwide public health emergency (Wang, Peter, Frederick, & George, 2020a). Since then, billions of people stopped commuting to work or school, avoided social contact, and even isolated themselves at home to prevent the spread of the pandemic (Fischer et al, 2020). Although such prevention and control measures can effectively stop the spread of a pandemic (Remuzzi & Remuzzi, 2020), they also spawn a series of social governance issues and have negative impacts on general public's mental health (Ahmad & Murad, 2020;Horton, 2020;Wang et al, 2020c).…”

Creative Lockdown? A Daily Diary Study of Creative Activity During Pandemics

“…But in these stressful conditions, all positive information, like new scientific discoveries announced, gains particular importance (Hobfoll, 2001 ; Hobfoll et al, 2018 ) and could raise hope, engagement, and interest. Additionally, using effective strategies for coping with stress can help individuals cope with the mental health challenges of quarantines and build positive emotions during COVID-19 social distancing (Fischer et al, 2020 ). This coexistence of different emotional states plays a role in creativity, as does the affective shift (Bledow et al, 2013 ).…”

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic Burnout on Cardiovascular Risk in Healthcare Professionals Study Protocol: A Multicenter Exploratory Longitudinal Study

“…Strategies to protect clinicians' well-being may involve a blended approach using online and onsite well-being programs, such as heart rate variability biofeedback, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, and mindfulness-based resilience training programs ( 29 ). Heart rate variability biofeedback has been used to regulate autonomic balance in patients with physical illnesses and mental disorders.…”