2017
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid screening for malignancy in organ donors: 15‐year experience with the Verona “Alert” protocol and review of the literature

Abstract: Histopathology is an essential component of the multidisciplinary assessment of donors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may apply also to lymphoproliferative disease found limited to the graft after transplantation, while it remains of great importance to detect active ongoing lymphoma in the donor that can subsequently spread in the recipient [5]. It is extremely encouraging that the transmission of some cancers, in which there are (17) 47 (20) 42 (18 specific donor guidelines to aid detection [9], namely choriocarcinoma, glioblastoma and NSC lung carcinoma have decreased. Indeed, all reported cases are dating back to the 1990s, before the establishment of guidelines and a critical evaluation of occurred cases [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may apply also to lymphoproliferative disease found limited to the graft after transplantation, while it remains of great importance to detect active ongoing lymphoma in the donor that can subsequently spread in the recipient [5]. It is extremely encouraging that the transmission of some cancers, in which there are (17) 47 (20) 42 (18 specific donor guidelines to aid detection [9], namely choriocarcinoma, glioblastoma and NSC lung carcinoma have decreased. Indeed, all reported cases are dating back to the 1990s, before the establishment of guidelines and a critical evaluation of occurred cases [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of autopsies to assess the donors is decreasing likely due to the cost of performing an autopsy [ 15 ] and a reluctance of the donor’s family, together with the greater availability of imaging techniques. However, autopsy can lead to the discovering of an unsuspected cancer, particularly for malignancies difficult to detect [ 16 , 17 ]. A definitive diagnosis of malignancy may not be possible immediately with frozen section and in most instances can be made within a few days however, allowing early and individualized management/treatment of the recipient, preventing the development of cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For donors with no known history of malignancies, current recommendations are to perform malignancy screening as indicated by age and/or sex. In contrast, a more stringent interpretation of the Italian national guidelines that incorporated histopathological examination led to higher detection rate for donor malignancy . Whether novel screening tests, such as circulating tumor DNA, would be helpful in early detection of malignancy in the future is still unclear but should be studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidelines and recommendations have been published in several countries [ 3 – 6 ] to stratify the risk of cancer transmission of donors with neoplastic potential. Guidelines are mainly based on large registries and sparse case reporting of transmission events, so they cannot cover all the possible findings and situations [ 7 , 8 ]. Indeed, evaluation of deceased donors at procurement can be critical when transplant professionals have to manage cases where an exhaustive medical history is not available or when investigations procedures could not be performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%