1999
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1999.61.654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid serologic diagnosis of pediatric typhoid fever in an endemic area: a prospective comparative evaluation of two dot-enzyme immunoassays and the Widal test.

Abstract: Abstract. We evaluated the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of two dot-enzyme-linked immunoassays (Typhidot and Typhidot-M; Malaysian Biodiagnostic Research SDN BHD, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), assessing IgG and IgM antibodies against the outer membrane protein (OMP) of Salmonella typhi, and the Widal test in comparison with blood culture in a consecutive group of children with suspected typhoid fever. Of 97 children with suspected typhoid fever, the disease was confirmed bacteriologically in 46 (47%), wher… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
47
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
14
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It uses a small volume of serum and the result can be interpreted in an hour. Blood culture was positive in 46% of cases which is comparable to other studies by Bhutta et al 19 , Dheer et al 26 , Mishra et al 31 and this may be attributable to the difficulties of obtaining large enough blood volumes for cultures from children and it is a low bacteremic illness.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It uses a small volume of serum and the result can be interpreted in an hour. Blood culture was positive in 46% of cases which is comparable to other studies by Bhutta et al 19 , Dheer et al 26 , Mishra et al 31 and this may be attributable to the difficulties of obtaining large enough blood volumes for cultures from children and it is a low bacteremic illness.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Results of the Widal test have demonstrated to vary between different areas and in time, due to variation in background levels as well as a result of variation in the quality of the antigen. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The need for a rapid and inexpensive laboratory test for early and accurate diagnosis of patients with typhoid fever has prompted the exploration of a variety of serologic and antigen detection methods, including counter immunoelectrophoresis, 13,14 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), [15][16][17][18] dot immunoassay, 16,[19][20][21] hemagglutination, 22 and coagglutination. 23 However, these assays are not very easy to perform, not rapid, require special equipment or skills, or depend on electricity and on refrigeration for storage of components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a novel microplate agglutination assay using the absorbed sheep red blood cells to enhance the Widal test reactivity appeared to be a useful alternative technique (19). The clinical application of a dot blot test (Typhidott and Typhidot-Mt) to detect IgG and IgM antibodies to the bacteria has been evaluated and gave superior results to the Widal test [20,21]. A dipstick assay developed for use in developing countries gave unacceptable results for sensitivity or specificity [22].…”
Section: Diagnosis Methods Of Typhoid Fevermentioning
confidence: 99%