2013
DOI: 10.2146/ajhp110724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid testing for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Implications for antimicrobial stewardship

Abstract: Currently available rapid MRSA assays differ in specificity, sensitivity, cost, FDA-approved applications, and laboratory turnaround time, and published data on their comparative merits in terms of patient care and economic outcomes are limited. The optimal role of such tests in antimicrobial stewardship programs remains to be defined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern polymerase chain reaction testing methods are improving time to identification of infectious pathogens including Staphylococcus aureus. There are several MRSA tests currently available in the United States [28]. Of these, the Xpert MRSA/ SA BC test has demonstrated improvements in time to initiation of antistaphylococcal therapy for MSSA (mean, 5.5 hours vs 49 hours) and reduced empirical initiation of vancomycin therapy [29].…”
Section: Impact Of Rapid Diagnostic Testing On Empirical Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern polymerase chain reaction testing methods are improving time to identification of infectious pathogens including Staphylococcus aureus. There are several MRSA tests currently available in the United States [28]. Of these, the Xpert MRSA/ SA BC test has demonstrated improvements in time to initiation of antistaphylococcal therapy for MSSA (mean, 5.5 hours vs 49 hours) and reduced empirical initiation of vancomycin therapy [29].…”
Section: Impact Of Rapid Diagnostic Testing On Empirical Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the many rapid tests that are available, choosing which test to use at an institution will depend on a variety of factors, including cost, reported specificity and sensitivity, time to test result, U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved indications, and the data available to support their use with regard to improvement of patient outcomes (8). Their role in antimicrobial stewardship ultimately relates to how they promote the goals of stewardship, namely, improving patient care and health care outcomes (8). For this study, we utilized CHROMagar medium, which, although not as rapid as molecular tests, can cost 5 to 20 times less than a molecular assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to standard culture and susceptibility testing methods that may take 48À96 hours, molecular MRSA assays (based on PCR or bacteriophage technology) can dramatically shorten laboratory turnaround times (to 1À5 hours) [39]. The recent development of real-time PCR has enabled reliable and rapid identification, characterization and quantification of clinical isolates of S. aureus, and supports the selection and implementation of effective infection control strategies (including the appropriate use of antibiotics).…”
Section: Staphylococcus Aureus Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%