2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapidly co-evolving technology adoption and diffusion models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(111 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An innovation that is inconsistent with the specified conditions, guidelines or practices won't be adopted or received as fast as an innovation that is compatible Customization (CU) Pine andGilmore (1999a, 1999b, p. 76) characterise customization as "…producing in light of a specific desire of analysing user." The researchers like Duray (2000a); Pine andGilmore (1999a, 1999b); Anuar et al (2014); Chiyangwa and Alexander (2016) said that it is significant to make the refinement in the varieties and customization. While customization takes a stab at satisfying individual user's needs, ranges include more choices from which the user can pick.…”
Section: Innovativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An innovation that is inconsistent with the specified conditions, guidelines or practices won't be adopted or received as fast as an innovation that is compatible Customization (CU) Pine andGilmore (1999a, 1999b, p. 76) characterise customization as "…producing in light of a specific desire of analysing user." The researchers like Duray (2000a); Pine andGilmore (1999a, 1999b); Anuar et al (2014); Chiyangwa and Alexander (2016) said that it is significant to make the refinement in the varieties and customization. While customization takes a stab at satisfying individual user's needs, ranges include more choices from which the user can pick.…”
Section: Innovativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trialability (TB) According to Vasseur and Kemp (2015); El-Gohary (2012); Seyal and Rahman (2003); Stockdale and Standing (2006); Moore and Benbasat (1991); Chiyangwa and Alexander (2016); Sabi et al (2016); Pham and Ho (2015); Hameed et al (2012a) said that "Trial-ability is the degree to which an innovation can be tried in a restricted premises." Innovations that can be attempted on the instalment arrangement are embraced quickly than innovations that are not tried.…”
Section: Innovativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trends in mobile technology development are tied to innovations (Chiyangwa & (Trish) Alexander, 2016). Meanwhile, innovation often leads to consumer frightening, which in turn leads to distrust.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Of Trust In Mobile Bankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, the competition offers a venue for increasing awareness, demonstrating relevance, building confidence, and proving satisfaction for faculty audiences. Furthermore, the influence of peers can play an important role in promoting change in the attitudes of faculty audiences 19,20,21,22 . The competition acting as a medium for triggering a contagion effect, or social spillover effect, can lead faculty audiences to imitate the adoption behaviors of their peer group of participants.…”
Section: Teaching Innovation With Technology Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%