2017
DOI: 10.18272/reo.v0i1.446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rare Birds in Ecuador: Third Report of the Committee for Ecuadorian Records in Ornithology (Cero)

Abstract: Presentamos nuevos registros de distribución de aves del Ecuador que han sido presentados al Comité Ecuatoriano de Registros Ornitológicos (CERO) entre abril 2014 y agosto 2015. Incluimos reportes de seis especies nuevas para Ecuador (Anas crecca, Thalassarche bulleri, Puffinus puffinus, Morus sp., Numenius americanus y Elaenia strepera), una especie nueva para el Ecuador continental (Fregetta grallaria), cuatro especies con primera documentación en Ecuador (Calidris alpina, Larus argentatus, Stercorarius long… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
25
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…understory communities) or have been focused on specific species [1,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Thus, though the Ecuadorian avifauna is fairly well known [30][31][32][33][34], and a fair number of informal species lists are available at the plethora of tourist lodges in the region, such lists are largely unpublished and have not been evaluated within a scientific framework [35,36]. The detailed distributions of many Amazonian species, there for, remain poorly described, in part due to the inaccessibility of much of this region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…understory communities) or have been focused on specific species [1,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Thus, though the Ecuadorian avifauna is fairly well known [30][31][32][33][34], and a fair number of informal species lists are available at the plethora of tourist lodges in the region, such lists are largely unpublished and have not been evaluated within a scientific framework [35,36]. The detailed distributions of many Amazonian species, there for, remain poorly described, in part due to the inaccessibility of much of this region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En este país, el piquero pardo fue considerado como un "visitante muy raro en aguas abiertas a lo largo de la costa del norte" (Ridgely & Greenfield, 2001), pero debido al incremento de sus registros, en la actualidad es considerado como un "vagabundo regular o transitorio a lo largo de la costa ecuatoriana" (Freile et al, 2017). Incluso, a partir de 2013, es observado de manera frecuente en algunas zonas como La Chocolatera (Salinas, 2°11'S; Freile et al, 2013Freile et al, , 2017eBird, 2017) (Tabla 2, Fig. 12, 18).…”
Section: Desplazamiento Del Piquero Pardo Hacia Mayores Latitudes Ausunclassified
“…12, 18). El registro del piquero pardo incluye además zonas más lejanas como las islas Galápagos (Wiedenfeld, 2006;Freile et al, 2013;eBird, 2017;GBIF, 2017;EcoRegistros, 2017). Los reportes de la especie en este archipiélago datarían al menos desde mediados del siglo XIX (Sundevall, 1871), pero en su momento estos fueron considerados como improbables, identificándolos como individuos jóvenes de piquero peruano o de patas azules (Gifford, 1913).…”
Section: Desplazamiento Del Piquero Pardo Hacia Mayores Latitudes Ausunclassified
“…With three reports published to date, CERO has updated and revised the national checklist of birds with data reported by several observers from February 1997 through March 2014 (Freile et al, 2013;Nilsson et al, 2014;Freile et al, 2017). To date, CERO has reported 22 new country records (19 species and 3 subspecies), first documented records for 22 species, and significant range extensions for 90 species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, CERO has reported 22 new country records (19 species and 3 subspecies), first documented records for 22 species, and significant range extensions for 90 species. Likewise, CERO has removed seven species from the country's bird list due to previous identification or labeling errors (Nilsson et al, 2014;Freile et al, 2017). This report presents new records received by CERO since its third report, and makes a thorough revision of all checklists published to date, in order to depurate the country list.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%