2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate and predictors of service disengagement in an epidemiological first-episode psychosis cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
62
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a very high rate of inclusion of families in services, with over 90% of participants having at least one service that included families. Previous research suggests the importance of family support and family involvement in care for engagement in treatment (Stowkowy et al, 2012; Conus et al, 2010). It is notable that participants’ ratings of family-related subjective quality of life were estimated to improve significantly over the study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We observed a very high rate of inclusion of families in services, with over 90% of participants having at least one service that included families. Previous research suggests the importance of family support and family involvement in care for engagement in treatment (Stowkowy et al, 2012; Conus et al, 2010). It is notable that participants’ ratings of family-related subjective quality of life were estimated to improve significantly over the study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review article exploring service disengagement within the FEP population estimates that approximately 30% of individuals drop out of treatment (Doyle et al, 2014). Two studies in the review found that disengagement was significantly associated with a lower severity illness at baseline (Conus et al, 2010; Schimmelmann et al, 2006). Conus et al, postulates that this could be explained by the fact the individuals with more severe illness, along with their families, may be more motivated for treatment and, similarly to our assessment above, treatment teams may also focus their efforts on individuals with more severe symptoms (Conus et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite evidence of clear benefit, EI services like many others, struggle to engage and retain young patients in their services, with data from two such programs indicating dropout rates of 23 % at 18 months [6] and 31 % at 30 months [7]. A relatively recent review exploring rates of disengagement in a variety of mental health settings reports that although varying, on average around one third of patients disengage with treatment at some point in the course of their care [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific risk factors for poor treatment engagement that have been identified including positive symptom severity, childhood exposure to violence, lower scores on ratings for negative symptoms and substance abuse [7, 9]. A large study conducted at a FES in Australia found that the primary predictors of disengagement were a prior forensic history, not living with family at the time of discharge from hospital, less severe illness at the time of diagnosis, and persistent substance use [6]. While such approaches can direct clinical attention to particular subgroups, they are less able to illuminate the interaction amongst several factors that determine engagement with care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%