2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate-dependent phase-field damage modeling of rubber and its experimental parameter identification

Abstract: Phase-field models have the advantage in that no geometric descriptions of cracks are required, which means that crack coalescence and branching can be treated without additional effort. Miehe et al. [1] introduced a rate-independent phase-field damage model for finite strains in which a viscous damage regularization was proposed. We extend the model to depend on the loading rate and time by incorporating rubber's strain-rate dependency in the constitutive description of the bulk, as well as in the damage driv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
77
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Applying a cyclic load to the rate-dependent phase-field damage model of [16], we show that this model describes fatigue damage but yields poor accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…• Applying a cyclic load to the rate-dependent phase-field damage model of [16], we show that this model describes fatigue damage but yields poor accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Consequently, they are able to handle crack propagation, branching and coalescence. The extension to finite strains and rubber was first published in [22], while [16] presented a rate-dependent phase-field damage model for rubbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increase of man-made materials that can undergo large elastic compressible deformations (Wismans et al, 2010;Schraedler et al, 2011;Kucheyev et al, 2012;Pokorný et al, 2017), as well as the increased interest in biological tissues that can undergo large elastic compressible deformations (Cotin et al, 1999;Baaijens et al, 2005;Hrapko et al, 2006;Carniel & Fancello, 2017), is partially responsible for this. In contrast to hypoelasticity (Truesdell, 1955;Khan et al, 2010;Beex & Peerlings, 2012), hyperelasticity also allows the formulation of error estimators in terms of stored and dissipated energies (Lovadina & Stenberg, 2006;Bui et al, 2018), which are invariant scalars, and it avoids erroneous energy dissipation of dissipative material models (Håkanson et al, 2005;Harrysson & Ristinmaa, 2008;Loew et al, 2019). Hyperelasticity is thus not only important for incompressible materials, but also for compressible materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%