1992
DOI: 10.1016/0956-7151(92)90145-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate effects in metal-ceramic interface sliding from the periodic film cracking technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
12
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several models have been developed to quantitatively calculate the maximum shear force or interfacial fracture energy. For examples, the shearlag analysis model [11][12][13][14] based on the periodic cracking of the film was developed to measure the maximum interface shear stress. Hutchinson and Suo [15] developed a model based on the elastic buckling of a film to calculate the interfacial fracture energy between the film and substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several models have been developed to quantitatively calculate the maximum shear force or interfacial fracture energy. For examples, the shearlag analysis model [11][12][13][14] based on the periodic cracking of the film was developed to measure the maximum interface shear stress. Hutchinson and Suo [15] developed a model based on the elastic buckling of a film to calculate the interfacial fracture energy between the film and substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easily included, as shown by Andersons and Leterrier et al [13][14][15] Similar shear lag analyses have been performed with SiO 2 -PET film systems as well as SiN x -Kapton film systems. [13][14][15] However, some differences are found between the preceding approach and others, [17,18] but both are based on the shear lag analysis of Kelly and Tyson. [26] In-situ tensile tests performed inside a scanning electron microscope (SEM) allow one to determine the system's fracture strain, where cracks first initiate, as well as any subsequent buckling and delamination that may occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Failure of the films by cleavage fracture is similar to previous studies of ceramic films on metal substrates pulled in tension. [17][18][19] With the periodic cracking method that is based on a shear lag analysis, [17,18,20,21] the maximum shear traction that is supported by the interface can be calculated. The periodic cracking method was first developed to study the shear properties of metal-ceramic interfaces, [17] with similar periodic cracking of other material systems having also been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fragmentation test is a method that can be easily implemented to examine substrate effects and testing conditions, utilizing uniaxial tensile straining to cause fracture and delamination of brittle films on compliant substrates [6][7][8][9][10]. The technique has been employed to study interfacial shear stresses with the interfacial yield model [11] for ceramic films on metal substrates [9,12] as well as metal and ceramic films on various polymer substrates [6,7,[13][14][15]. Of possible substrate materials, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is considered a viable substrate material due to its cost effectiveness and continuous processing capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%