1966
DOI: 10.2307/1932992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rates of Carbon Dioxide Evolution From the Forest Floor

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecology.Abstract. Evolution of CO2 from the forest floor measured by the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of dynamic and static chambers for the measurement of carbon dioxide flux from soils also reveals ratios ranging from 1.0 to 2.1, with an average value of about 1.3 (e.g. Cropper et al, 1985;Edwards and Sollins, 1973;Ino and Monsi, 1969;Kucera and Kirkham, 1971;Witkamp, 1966).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of dynamic and static chambers for the measurement of carbon dioxide flux from soils also reveals ratios ranging from 1.0 to 2.1, with an average value of about 1.3 (e.g. Cropper et al, 1985;Edwards and Sollins, 1973;Ino and Monsi, 1969;Kucera and Kirkham, 1971;Witkamp, 1966).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the soil surface becomes dry, the proportion of CO 2 from roots will increase due to a reduction of microbial activity by the low surface moisture. This may explain the wide range of the proportion of root respiration to total soil respiration that is reported in the literature, from negligible (Witkamp 1966), 50% (Biscoe et al 1975;Rochette et al 1997), 60-63% (Da Costa et al 1986, to 70% by Chapman (1979).…”
Section: Carbon Dioxide Fluxmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The basal soil respiration rate in the soil samples collected from two sites was measured at monthly intervals using the alkali absorption technique (Witkamp, 1966). Fresh soil of 500 g, with its moisture content adjusted to 60 per cent by adding sterile water, was placed in a glass container (2 l capacity).…”
Section: Basal Soil Respirationmentioning
confidence: 99%