2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0898-1221(01)00127-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rates of convergence of approximate maximum likelihood estimators in the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the whole trajectory of the diffusion can be observed, then the parameter estimation problem is relatively simple, but of practical contemporary interest is work in which an approximate estimator, using only information gleaned from the underlying process in discrete time, is able to do as well as an estimator that uses continuously gathered information. Several methods have been employed to construct good estimators for this challenging question of discretely observed diffusions; among these methods, we refer to numerical approximation of the likelihood function (see [1,5,32]), martingale estimating functions (see [6]), indirect statistical inference (see [16]), the Bayesian approach (see [15]), some sharp probabilistic bounds on the convergence of estimators in [7], and [10,12,31] for particular situations. We mention the survey [36] for parameter estimation in discrete cases, further details in [21,25] and the book [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the whole trajectory of the diffusion can be observed, then the parameter estimation problem is relatively simple, but of practical contemporary interest is work in which an approximate estimator, using only information gleaned from the underlying process in discrete time, is able to do as well as an estimator that uses continuously gathered information. Several methods have been employed to construct good estimators for this challenging question of discretely observed diffusions; among these methods, we refer to numerical approximation of the likelihood function (see [1,5,32]), martingale estimating functions (see [6]), indirect statistical inference (see [16]), the Bayesian approach (see [15]), some sharp probabilistic bounds on the convergence of estimators in [7], and [10,12,31] for particular situations. We mention the survey [36] for parameter estimation in discrete cases, further details in [21,25] and the book [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some strong known results concerning equation (7). In [30] strong existence and uniqueness is proved assuming only the linear growth…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different values of the window size land the drift parameter 1 are considered in order to compare this scheme (based on ¡t) with the detection schemes proposed in [13,14] (t), to provide an good trade-of between robustness against false alarms and sensitivity to faults. This behavior is typical in a wide range of values of 1 e [1,10]. For smaller values of 1, the scheme ¡t may trigger some false alarms (its behavior approaching that of ¡i a )\ for very large values of X, the scheme ¡t approaches the conservative behavior of fi c , but it is a bit more sensitive to faults.…”
Section: Simulation Examplementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Most of the works provide estimators for the drift parameter X (see [10,18,35]) which in our case is known by design; in [3,30,52] maximum likelihood (ML) estimators for the mean parameter ¡A are provided whereas the estimation of a is usually referred to the computation of a limit [ 6]. In general, these results do not apply to the case of time-varying vector faults.…”
Section: The Ornstein-uhlenbeck Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bishwal (2001) obtained weak convergence bound of the order OðT À1=2 Þ for the MLE and Bayes estimators using two different random normings which are useful for computation of a confidence interval. Bishwal and Bose (2001) obtained weak convergence bound for two approximate maximum likelihood estimators (AMLEs). Note that in the stationary case where X 0 has Nð0; À1=2yÞ distribution, the exact log-likelihood function is given by…”
Section: New Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%