in diameter better than single-detector CTPA. 15-17 Over the years, refined clinical assessment in combination with D-dimer testing and other imaging techniques (eg, CTPA) made invasive strategies (ie, pulmonary angiography) unnecessary in diagnosing PE. 18-26 Due to the greater accessibility of CTPA and its ability to provide information on a possible alternative diagnosis, the use of ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning has also decreased significantly. 27-29 According to a nationwide study performed in the United States, the incidence of PE has increased by 81% since CTPA was introduced. 30 This fact could be explained in different ways. Whereas a true increase in the incidence of PE (eg, due to an increased prevalence of risk factors) is possible, some studies also reported a decrease in the case-fatality rate of PE, associated with a stable or slight decrease in the mortality rate. 30-37 Although this slight improvement in mortality might be due to earlier diagnosis and better management, potential overdiagnosis of less severe PE could also be considered. Multidetector CTPA was reported to detect proportionally more cases of subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) compared with single-detector CT, and, despite an increased number of diagnoses,