The World Wide Web Conference 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3308558.3313413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rating Augmentation with Generative Adversarial Networks towards Accurate Collaborative Filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the interplay between these two components, the model reaches the Nash equilibrium where G has learned to mimic the ground-truth data distribution, e.g., a profile of a particular user. In the present survey, we identified different application for GAN-based RS that include, improving negative sampling step in learning-to-rank objective function [39,126], fitting the generator to predict missing ratings by leveraging both temporal [8,147] and sideinformation [18,125], or augmenting training dataset [17,37].…”
Section: Cf Models Since Early Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through the interplay between these two components, the model reaches the Nash equilibrium where G has learned to mimic the ground-truth data distribution, e.g., a profile of a particular user. In the present survey, we identified different application for GAN-based RS that include, improving negative sampling step in learning-to-rank objective function [39,126], fitting the generator to predict missing ratings by leveraging both temporal [8,147] and sideinformation [18,125], or augmenting training dataset [17,37].…”
Section: Cf Models Since Early Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GANs have been shown powerful in generating relevant recommendations -in particular, using the CF approach -and capable of successively competing with state-of-the-art models in the field of RS. We have identified the following reasons for the potential of GANs in RS: (i) they are able to generalize well and learn unknown user preference distributions and thus be able to model user preference in complex settings (e.g., IRGAN [125] and CFGAN [18]); (ii) they are capable of generating more negative samples than random samples in pairwise learning tasks (e.g., APL [108], DASO [39]) and (iii) they can be used for data augmentation (e.g., AugCF [127] and RAGAN [17]).…”
Section: Collaborative Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this issue, IRGAN [22], the first to introduce GAN into recommendation problems, employs the policy gradient strategy to estimate the gradients, while other models adopt NNs (e.g. multi-layer perceptrons (MLP)) as fake rating generators to enable stochastic gradient descent (SGD) [2]. GAIN [25] generatively imputes the missing ratings in the user-item matrix as an data augmentation approach by a fully-connected neural network.…”
Section: Adversarial Learning In Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ciao 2 The CiaoDVD dataset is collected from the Ciao website dvd.ciao.co.uk in December, 2013. In this dataset, some users give repetitive ratings to the same item at different timestamps.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this does not well-address the "biased learning" problems. Notably, recent studies attempt to incorporate adversarial training as a new direction to alleviate the cold-start problems in recommendation, which performs data augmentation by imposing adversarial perturbations [1,2,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%