1982
DOI: 10.1680/iicep.1982.1625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rating Curves for Rivers With Overbank Flow.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with all flow data acquired via a rating curve, errors will increase at higher flows and in particular will be greater when flow is out of bank. Both these conditions apply here and previous studies of rating curve accuracy in such situations indicate that errors in measured flow of up to ±20% may occur (Ervine and Baird, 1982). This is likely to be much greater than the net sum of all other components of the hydrological mass balance along the reach.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As with all flow data acquired via a rating curve, errors will increase at higher flows and in particular will be greater when flow is out of bank. Both these conditions apply here and previous studies of rating curve accuracy in such situations indicate that errors in measured flow of up to ±20% may occur (Ervine and Baird, 1982). This is likely to be much greater than the net sum of all other components of the hydrological mass balance along the reach.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 62%
“…6. Based on previous studies (Ervine and Baird, 1982) we assume the error in gauged discharge for overbank flow for this reach may be as much as ±20%. Assessing the error in ASAR estimates of flooded area is more difficult due to lack of ground truth data, however for satellite SAR systems this has been found to be of the order of ±10% .…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myers (1978), Wormleaton et al (1982), and Prinos and Townsend (1984) considered the discharge calculated using the "single channel"-method which was found 16-40% smaller than from observations, and that the error gradually increases with the resistance in the main channel and floodplain. Prinos and Townsend (1984), Ervine and Baird (1982), and Wormleaton and Merrett (1990) suggested that the main channel and floodplain should be treated separately. The total discharge was calculated by summing the discharges of the various subsections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fawcett et al, 1995), particularly where the model has been calibrated or where there may be uncertainty over the observed data. In this case, rating curves for out-of-bank flow are notoriously difficult to estimate accurately (see Ervine and Baird, 1982) and this may be a factor here. Having achieved a calibrated run on the long reach, coarse mesh, it was possible to extract the necessary boundary condition input and output hydrographs for the fine mesh.…”
Section: Hydraulic Model Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%