Rating Faculty Collegiality

Cipriano, Robert E.; Buller, Jeffrey L.

doi:10.1080/00091383.2012.655219

Cited by 31 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The FCS developed in the present study offers business school academics a glimpse into the dimensions that academics perceive to be indicators of a good colleagueone that provides support and is trustworthy; does not engage in politics and positioning to advantage their own situation; and contributes to the well-being of the students, the department and the university. These three dimensions map well with Cipriano and Buller's (2012a) framework of collegial behavior within a university and Shah's (2011) TCS for secondary school teachers. The FCS exhibited surprisingly strong psychometric properties, which suggests that the FCS has the promise to be a reliable and valid measure of a business school's level of collegiality.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 57%

“…Cipriano and Buller (2012a, p. 46) indicate that when university administrators do not have a formal 323 Collegiality in business schools institutional definition of collegiality they tend to resort to "I know it when I see it." Cipriano and Buller (2012a) noted six themes that emerged as hallmarks of collegial behavior including: collaborating with other faculty and the administration; "stepping up" to serve the common good; being responsible with work duties; respecting the university's decision-making processes; respecting others; and being supportive and helpful. Much of what a faculty member does both within their home institution and in the profession at large is shaped by perceptions of what it means to be a good colleague and how to manage their professional relationships with their external and internal colleagues.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Collegiality in business schools

Miles

Shepherd

Rose

et al. 2015

International Journal of Educational Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emeraldsrm:305060 [] For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -While collegiality is often discussed and touted as a critical aspect of academia, there is little research that empirically examines collegiality in university business schools. One cause of the paucity of research is the lack of a reliable scale to measure collegiality (Sabharwal, 2011). The purpose of this paper is to develop a scale that measures collegiality at the departmental level for university faculty, and then uses it to understand the implications of collegiality within an academic department within a business school. Design/methodology/approach -The present study uses a scale development process consisting of: defining the domain of the construct; item generation; and psychometric assessment of the scale's reliability and validity. Items were adapted for a university business school context from Shah (2011) and Seigel and Miner-Rubino (2009). The scale was administrated using a convenience non-random sample design drawn from active marketing and entrepreneurship academics who subscribe to the American Marketing Association's ELMAR and the Academy of Management's ENTRE list-serves. Findings -The faculty collegiality scale (FCS) was found to exhibit sound psychometric properties in this study. The study found that assessments of department-level collegiality are associated with budgets, performance evaluation processes, and workload allocations. In addition, factors from the FCS mediate the relationships between institutional variables and work satisfaction, which indicate that collegiality is an important determinant of work satisfaction in a contemporary university environment. Originality/value -The FCS developed in the present study offers business school academics and administrators a glimpse into the dimensions of what the marketing and entrepreneurship academics perceive makes a good colleagueone that provides professional and social support and is trustworthy; does not engage in politics, positioning, or rent-seeking to advantage their own situation; and that contributes to the well-being of the students, the department, the discipline and ...

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 57%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collegiality in business schools

Miles

Shepherd

Rose

et al. 2015

International Journal of Educational Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To counteract the fact that collegiality is a rather ambiguous and/or subjective term, Cipriano and Buller (2012) developed a Collegiality Assessment Matrix. It reflects the observable behaviors that are regarded as most highly related to the ways in which collegiality is demonstrated in an academic setting, and it is being used at a growing number of institutions worldwide to objectively appraise collegial behavior.…”

Section: Survey Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trouble and Strife: Preventing Bullying and Mobbing in Academe

Waltje¹,

Trujillo-Jenks²

2017

The Department Chair

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The most common reason for answering “not sure” is the belief that collegiality is an ambiguous term. Cipriano and Buller (2012) developed a Collegiality Assessment Matrix that reflects the observable behaviors that are regarded as most highly related to the ways in which collegiality is demonstrated in an academic setting. Many colleges and universities in the United States, as well as Saudi Arabia, are currently using the matrix to determine an individual's collegial behavior.…”

Section: Collegialitymentioning

confidence: 99%