2013
DOI: 10.1002/gamm.201310002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rational Krylov approximation of matrix functions: Numerical methods and optimal pole selection

Abstract: Matrix functions are a central topic of linear algebra, and problems of their numerical approximation appear increasingly often in scientific computing. We review various rational Krylov methods for the computation of large‐scale matrix functions. Emphasis is put on the rational Arnoldi method and variants thereof, namely, the extended Krylov subspace method and the shift‐and‐invert Arnoldi method, but we also discuss the nonorthogonal generalized Leja point (or PAIN) method. The issue of optimal pole selectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
185
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
185
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Langevin dynamics [32] could be used to replace solvent forces by homogenized and stochastic forces while preserving symplecticity [56]. Finally, we also plan to test out an approach to obtain coarse-grained parallelism using rational Krylov subspaces instead: the associated rational Arnoldi method, in which a linear system is solved independently for each pole of the polynomial denominator [20], could offer a coarse-grained way to parallelize the matrix function computations involved in the integrator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Langevin dynamics [32] could be used to replace solvent forces by homogenized and stochastic forces while preserving symplecticity [56]. Finally, we also plan to test out an approach to obtain coarse-grained parallelism using rational Krylov subspaces instead: the associated rational Arnoldi method, in which a linear system is solved independently for each pole of the polynomial denominator [20], could offer a coarse-grained way to parallelize the matrix function computations involved in the integrator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the large literature on Krylov methods for matrix functions we cite just the recent survey by Güttel [25].…”
Section: Methods For F (A)bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by Lu & Wachspress [14], and their computation by a few lines of MATLAB code is described by Sabino [19, p.43]. Other selections associated with quasi-optimal rational approximation of matrix functions could be used instead; see for example, Beckermann & Reichel [3] or Güttel [11]. In our setting (with m > 1), given an estimate for the interval S that contains the eigenvalues of each of the matrices A 1 , .…”
Section: Multiple Parameter Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%