2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1477175609990200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationalism and Empiricism: Will the Debate Ever End?

Abstract: Anyone taking a class in Modern Philosophy will learn that one of the most important issues in 17th and 18th Century philosophy was the debate between rationalists and empiricists. In 2005, Matthias Steup and Ernest Sosa edited a book entitled Contemporary Debates In Epistemology (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2007), which includes a chapter entitled ‘Is There A Priori Knowledge?’ (pp. 98–122). In this chapter, Laurence BonJour defends rationalism and Michael Devitt defends empiricism. So, this philosophical debate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More importantly, the influence of Dualism has continued in the 20th century because its principles have flown into Rationalism. There, the concept of “mind” is transposed into the concept of “reason,” i.e., the human capacity of thinking that derives from intrinsic intellectual structures of deduction (BonJour, 1997; Murphy, 2010). Rationalism claims that the only source of knowledge is the a priori reason.…”
Section: School Practice and Methods: Why It Is The Way It Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, the influence of Dualism has continued in the 20th century because its principles have flown into Rationalism. There, the concept of “mind” is transposed into the concept of “reason,” i.e., the human capacity of thinking that derives from intrinsic intellectual structures of deduction (BonJour, 1997; Murphy, 2010). Rationalism claims that the only source of knowledge is the a priori reason.…”
Section: School Practice and Methods: Why It Is The Way It Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All knowledge and justified belief rest ultimately on a foundation of non‐inferential knowledge or justified belief.’ [27] (p. 9). This approach historically has underpinned two varieties of foundationalist theories were rationalism that believes that knowledge is based in reason – and empiricism (or British Empiricism), which believes that knowledge is based in experience, it is often understood as universalism [28]. However, the universalism notion is very controversial and highly contested in philosophical circles.…”
Section: Revisiting Paradigm and Methodology In Health Services Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%