2017
DOI: 10.1166/asl.2017.10165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rationality and Logic Castigation from the Western Scholarly Perspective Towards Allegations of Anti-Hadith Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, without contradictory evidence or a compelling argument, Muslim hadith scholars and jurists generally regard a statement ascribed to the Prophet as something he uttered. A scholar was expected to conduct a critical analysis of a hadith only if he or she had compelling reasons to dispute its validity (Brown, 2009;Wazir, Usman, Syopiyan, & Nasir, 2017).…”
Section: Results and Discussion The Fabricated Hadith: History And Di...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, without contradictory evidence or a compelling argument, Muslim hadith scholars and jurists generally regard a statement ascribed to the Prophet as something he uttered. A scholar was expected to conduct a critical analysis of a hadith only if he or she had compelling reasons to dispute its validity (Brown, 2009;Wazir, Usman, Syopiyan, & Nasir, 2017).…”
Section: Results and Discussion The Fabricated Hadith: History And Di...mentioning
confidence: 99%