2003
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/16/8/308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RBS characterization of MgB2superconducting films annealedex situandin situ

Abstract: The elemental composition and depth profiles of MgB2 films prepared by successive e-beam evaporation as well as by thermal co-deposition of Mg and B components were investigated by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS). In the case of films deposited by e-beam evaporation we studied both Mg-B precursors and appropriate MgB2 films grown on glassy carbon, Si(100) and J-sapphire substrates annealed in situ. For the films co-deposited by thermal evaporation on R-sapphire substrates and annealed ex situ we i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular beam epitaxy [15,16], reactive evaporation [17], and hybrid physical-chemical vapor deposition (HPCVD) [6,7,14] have been particularly successful in making high-quality epitaxial films. In contrast, the growth of non-epitaxial MgB 2 films on amorphous or polycrystalline substrates has attracted relatively limited attention and yielded less promising results [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22]. Indeed, non-epitaxial films typically exhibit large surface roughness and reduced T c [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Molecular beam epitaxy [15,16], reactive evaporation [17], and hybrid physical-chemical vapor deposition (HPCVD) [6,7,14] have been particularly successful in making high-quality epitaxial films. In contrast, the growth of non-epitaxial MgB 2 films on amorphous or polycrystalline substrates has attracted relatively limited attention and yielded less promising results [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22]. Indeed, non-epitaxial films typically exhibit large surface roughness and reduced T c [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the growth of non-epitaxial MgB 2 films on amorphous or polycrystalline substrates has attracted relatively limited attention and yielded less promising results [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22]. Indeed, non-epitaxial films typically exhibit large surface roughness and reduced T c [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22]. For example, films prepared on glassy carbon substrates by co-deposition of Mg and B followed by annealing at 700 °C had large roughness, depressed T c values of 25-30 K, and compositional non-uniformity manifested as the Mg/B ratio varying as a function of depth [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, there is thermal decomposition at high temperature in the synthesis of MgB 2 . To fabricate high quality superconducting MgB 2 thin films, several methods have been applied, including two-step in situ annealing techniques [3][4][5][6][7], two-step ex situ annealing techniques [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and as-grown techniques [2,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] such as hybrid physicalchemical vapor deposition (HPCVD) [2,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. In HPCVD B 2 H 6 is flammable, explosive, poisonous and expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The buffer-material should have the well-matched crystal structure to MgB 2 lattice parameters. The reasonable buffers [12,13] such as AlN, SiC, Al 2 O 3 , NbN, and TiB 2 materials on silicon substrates are used in various growth methods such as the in situ reactive evaporation [14,15], pulsed laser deposition [16][17][18] [19][20][21], and the sequential E-beam evaporation of Mg-B bilayer followed by an in situ annealing [22][23][24][25][26]. But the HPCVD growth of MgB 2 thin films using buffered silicon substrates has not yet been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%