1990
DOI: 10.1017/s0033822200039953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Evaluation of British Museum Radiocarbon Dates Issued Between 1980 and 1984

Abstract: Dates issued by the British Museum radiocarbon laboratory between 1980 and 1984 are known to have been in error. This paper outlines the cause of the problem and the procedures adopted to revise the results affected. Where revision has been possible, on average this has given dates older by 200 to 300 radiocarbon years. The individual revised results are tabulated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another 1914C dates were measured in 1981, but only 1 (BM-1790) relates to the MBA (Burleigh 1983). Unfortunately, these 19 dates are among those measured in the British Museum laboratory during a period for which a systematic uncertainty has been identified, which affects their reliability (Tite et a1.1987;Bowman, Ambers and Leese 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another 1914C dates were measured in 1981, but only 1 (BM-1790) relates to the MBA (Burleigh 1983). Unfortunately, these 19 dates are among those measured in the British Museum laboratory during a period for which a systematic uncertainty has been identified, which affects their reliability (Tite et a1.1987;Bowman, Ambers and Leese 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidencias de las dificultades de mantener un sistema de medición de C 14 confiable, las suministra el laboratorio British Museum (Bowman et al 1990; Ambers l998), que debió recalcular las edades C 14 informadas entre los años 1980 y 1984, con diferencias de 200 a 300 años más "jóvenes". La reacción de los laboratorios fue instituir un sistema de control de calidad por intercomparación de resultados C 14 que se realizan aproximadamente cada cuatro años (Figini 1994a(Figini , 1994bFigini et al 1999).…”
Section: Intercomparación De Los Resultados Del Latyr Beta Analytic unclassified
“…It is now generally acknowledged that, before the widespread introduction of full quality control measures, laboratories tended to overestimate both the accuracy and precision of 14C results-an inference supported by several intercomparison studies (e.g., Aitchison et a1.1990). Further evidence of the difficulty of maintaining a reliable 14C measurement system is provided by the decision by the British Museum to withdraw and reissue all analyses issued by the laboratory between 1980and 1984(Bowman, Ambers and Leese 1990. While this is perhaps the most spectacular example of a laboratory recognizing and attempting to correct for a flaw in its methods, it is by no means unique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%