2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-evaluation of the irradiation conditions in the IFMIF test cell based on the EVEDA phase design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar analyses were carried out in the past for the IFMIF facility [17][18][19]. One may expect similar performances for DEMO, but due to the different configuration of the facility new results are obtained and quantified following different criteria.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar analyses were carried out in the past for the IFMIF facility [17][18][19]. One may expect similar performances for DEMO, but due to the different configuration of the facility new results are obtained and quantified following different criteria.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…As previously mentioned, only the volume with the higher dose rate will be used in IFMIF-DONES to irradiate structural materials: the high flux area of about 0.5 l volume and a neutron fluence of typically 10 17 n m −2 s −1 , inducing up to 20 dpa/ full power year (iron equivalent) in the materials. In figure 2 the current CAD design of the HFTM [19,21,22] assembly and the irradiation rigs with specimen is shown. In the beam footprint region, the HFTM is built from a thin walled container divided into eight compartments; three rigs can be placed on each of them (a total of 24 rigs, 720 cm 3 volume available for specimens).…”
Section: Mcnp Geometrical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it has been previously mentioned, only the volume with the higher dose rate will be used in IFMIF-DONES to irradiate structural materials: a high flux area of about 0.5 litre and a neutron fluence rate of typically 10 17 n m −2 s −1 , inducing up to 20 dpa fpy −1 (iron equivalent) in the materials are foreseen. In figure 2 the current CAD design of the HFTM [24,32,33] assembly and the irradiation rigs with specimen is shown. In the beam footprint region, the HFTM is built from a thin walled container divided into 8 compartments, and 3 rigs can be placed on each of them (a total of 24 rigs, 720 cm 3 volume available for specimens).…”
Section: Ifmif-dones (Demo Oriented Neutron Source)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume fraction considered for experimental specimen packaging is the same for all the materials evaluated. The packaging used is 74.19% of the material under study and 25.81% of NaK, as specified in the HFTM DDD report [33].The criterium chosen to evaluate whether the kind of samples distribution in the HFTM is optimal or not, was selected assessing how close are the damage dose rate or the gas production to damage dose ratio from the values expected in the nuclear fusion reactor. They can be divided in three studies, cases in which a dedicated irradiation campaign is designed, cases in which a joint irradiation campaign is tested and the cases in which a optimization of the irradiation area have been tried.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Cases With Different Alloy Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because IFMIF utilizes the d-Li nuclear reaction with deuterons energy of 40 MeV, high energy neutrons up to 55 MeV are produced [8]. As for the shielding benchmark in the energy range above 20 MeV, the TIARA transmission experiments through iron and concrete using p-Li quasi-monoenergetic neutron source [9,10] have been analyzed using FENDL-3/SLIB4.…”
Section: Introduction Amentioning
confidence: 99%