2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2359813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Examining Real Earnings Management to Avoid Losses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He selects an interval on the immediate right of zero as the most likely to contain firms engaged in earnings management than other firms providing evidence that they manipulate sales, production and expenses to avoid reporting a loss. While Roychowdhury (2006) focuses on earnings management by small profit firms, Siriviriyakul (2013) compares real activities manipulation of small-profit and small-loss firms and finds no difference between them.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He selects an interval on the immediate right of zero as the most likely to contain firms engaged in earnings management than other firms providing evidence that they manipulate sales, production and expenses to avoid reporting a loss. While Roychowdhury (2006) focuses on earnings management by small profit firms, Siriviriyakul (2013) compares real activities manipulation of small-profit and small-loss firms and finds no difference between them.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study mainly uses cross-sectional regression analyses. Siriviriyakul (2013) argues that model-predicted EM proxies are likely to have systematic biases; Cohen, Pandit, Wasley, and Zach (2013) suggest that performance matching reduces the degree of misspecification in REM proxies. Therefore, for robustness purposes, we also implement propensity matching in our analyses of the three events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of using random effects is that it takes individual effects into account, captured by the interception of each company. This should provide a better approximation to the error term for each company, than the estimates for sectors used by Roychowdhury (2006), Cardoso (2009), Gunny (2010) and Zang (2012), considered insufficient in dealing with the problem of high performing companies within the same sector (Siriviriyakul, 2013). As can be seen in Figure 1, there is a greater concentration of information on the positive side, suggesting that, between 2008 and 2013, Brazilian companies listed on the BM&FBOVESPA more often reported positive profit margins.…”
Section: Econometric Models For Testing the Paper's Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these contributions, the statistical models used in this study, as well as in other, particularly international literature, still need to be refined in order to improve the earnings management via operating decisions proxies (Siriviriyakul, 2013).…”
Section: Final Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%