2015
DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re: Is screening for congenital colour vision deficiency in school students worthwhile?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CVD is documented to be risk factor for driving and accidents. [2] In our study, there was negative association of CVD to RTA and head injuries. Perhaps, these students are subconsciously extravigilant and more cautious in driving and thus could avoid risk of accidents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CVD is documented to be risk factor for driving and accidents. [2] In our study, there was negative association of CVD to RTA and head injuries. Perhaps, these students are subconsciously extravigilant and more cautious in driving and thus could avoid risk of accidents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Since, to the best of our current knowledge, there is no cure and possibility of labeling a person with such defect as blind, screening is not justified for early detection of CVD. [2]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this article has received disagreement from other researchers. Based on personal experience with congenital colour vision defects, Cole (2015) agree to disagree with the conclusion made by the writer. He believes that pupils with CCVD do need to know about their condition before the end of their schooling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%