2016
DOI: 10.1080/23337486.2016.1262658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-thinking hegemonic masculinities in conflict-affected contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of these constructions and assumptions, and although agency is considered inherently masculine, male survivors who are perceived to have been robbed of their masculinity as a result of sexual violence (Myrttinen et al, 2016) are by association also seen as deprived of their agency. Throughout existing research, male survivors are thus commonly ‘cast through the dichotomy of victim and agency’ (Walker, 2010: 9) that obscures the complexities of their lived realities.…”
Section: Gendered Victimhood Vulnerabilities and Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result of these constructions and assumptions, and although agency is considered inherently masculine, male survivors who are perceived to have been robbed of their masculinity as a result of sexual violence (Myrttinen et al, 2016) are by association also seen as deprived of their agency. Throughout existing research, male survivors are thus commonly ‘cast through the dichotomy of victim and agency’ (Walker, 2010: 9) that obscures the complexities of their lived realities.…”
Section: Gendered Victimhood Vulnerabilities and Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, although wartime sexual violence against men occurs more frequently than is often assumed (Sivakumaran, 2007), little is known about its dynamics, and male survivors’ experiences remain of peripheral concern to academics and practitioners alike (Touquet and Gorris, 2016). Despite this prevailing marginalization of sexual violence against men, studies have begun to explore how socially constructed masculinities render men vulnerable to gender-based violence in the first place (Carpenter, 2006) and how sexual violence impacts upon male survivors’ gendered identities as men (Myrttinen et al, 2016; Schulz, 2018a; Touquet, 2018). If and when attention is paid to male-directed sexual abuse, however, most studies examine such crimes almost exclusively through the frame of vulnerabilities, portraying male survivors as passive, humiliated, and indefinitely stripped of their manhood (see Sivakumaran, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such narratives both serve to close down the moral space for dissent against the ‘war on terror’ (Shepherd, 2006: 26) and come together in such a way that ideas about gendered oppression and sexual violence become a ‘discourse of border control’ that defines the parameters of European nation-states, as well as ‘who is included and who excluded, culturally, racially, and legally’ (Ticktin, 2008: 864; see also Cloud, 2004; Grewal, 2003; Zalewski and Runyan, 2015: 452). Through these narratives of ‘masculinist protection’ (Young, 2003), not only is female agency erased but, also, ‘the notion of male vulnerability [becomes] essentially unimaginable’ (Myrttinen et al, 2017: 110, emphasis in original; see also Carpenter, 2006).…”
Section: Analytical Framework: Gender and Race As The Scaffold Of Colmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these may have an increased appeal, however, given an increased global focus on racialised masculinities and 'security risks' that potentially brown (Muslim) men entail for successful reconstruction of societies (Enria 2017, 241), or uses of simplified gender analysis to combat violent extremism, seem to offer (Ezekilov 2017). Association between masculinities and violence and conflict, using the concept of gender, is increasingly common; at the heart of such a notion is the reduction of gender roles and norms into a dichotomy of women as victims and men as perpetrators (Zarkov 2001(Zarkov , 2008MacKenzie 2012;Myrttinen et al 2016;Enria 2017). Constructs of Middle Eastern (Muslim) men, in particular, draw on the elements of patriarchy, dominance and violence (Inhorn 2012, 15), also common in gender policies of post-disaster and post-conflict reconstruction in which men are portrayed as 'policy problems' .…”
Section: The Many Faces Of Masculinitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, poor, uneducated men are depicted as oppressive, lazy and violent, and therefore in need of reform (Bedford 2007(Bedford , 2009Jauhola 2013). In fact, it is suggested that theorising on post-conflict masculinities has lacked in-depth understanding of variations, contextual specificities (Myrttinen et al 2016;Cornwall 2017, 35) and historicity, all of which challenge the analytical reliance on 'monolithic ethnographic presence' (Cornwall 2017, 35).…”
Section: The Many Faces Of Masculinitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%